Tools & Wizards About Us
gcltechnologies.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

gcltechnologies.co.in

GCL TECHNOLOGIES| India's Leading IT Website Company in NEW DELHI

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

227 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

329 ms

gcltechnologies.co.in screenshot

About Website

Visit gcltechnologies.co.in now to see the best up-to-date GCL TECHNOLOGIES content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gcltechnologies.co.in

GCL TECHNOLOGIES is the leading IT Company which is offering Website Designing and development Services in India. Website Designing Company in Delhi.

Visit gcltechnologies.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Gcltechnologies.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gcltechnologies.co.in performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gcltechnologies.co.in

227 ms

bootstrap.min.css

155 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

163 ms

font-awesome.min.css

153 ms

main.css

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Gcltechnologies.co.in, 4% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (725 ms) belongs to the original domain Gcltechnologies.co.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 241.1 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gcltechnologies.co.in main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 29.9 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 62.5 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GCL TECHNOLOGIES images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 83.4 kB

  • Original 210.3 kB
  • After minification 210.3 kB
  • After compression 126.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.4 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 62.9 kB

  • Original 113.1 kB
  • After minification 107.2 kB
  • After compression 50.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gcltechnologies.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.9 kB or 56% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (36%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

56

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GCL TECHNOLOGIES. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gcltechnologies.co.in

gcltechnologies.co.in

227 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

155 ms

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

bootstrap-responsive.min.css

163 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

153 ms

main.css

main.css

161 ms

sl-slide.css

sl-slide.css

155 ms

non-responsive.css

non-responsive.css

162 ms

niyati-layout.css

niyati-layout.css

231 ms

style2.css

style2.css

234 ms

css

css

24 ms

common.css

common.css

231 ms

style5.css

style5.css

232 ms

css

css

40 ms

styles.css

styles.css

231 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

6 ms

script.js

script.js

232 ms

component.css

component.css

310 ms

component1.css

component1.css

307 ms

slider.css

slider.css

306 ms

slider.js

slider.js

311 ms

scrooler.css

scrooler.css

309 ms

modernizr.custom.53451.js

modernizr.custom.53451.js

313 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

438 ms

reveal.css

reveal.css

437 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

509 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

437 ms

main.js

main.js

436 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

8 ms

jquery.cslider.js

jquery.cslider.js

435 ms

classie.js

classie.js

526 ms

jquery.gallery.js

jquery.gallery.js

528 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

530 ms

css

css

17 ms

ga.js

ga.js

20 ms

127 ms

contact.png

contact.png

496 ms

2.png

2.png

408 ms

3.png

3.png

265 ms

5.png

5.png

344 ms

seo.png

seo.png

347 ms

ecommerce.png

ecommerce.png

349 ms

latest.png

latest.png

343 ms

p1.jpg

p1.jpg

494 ms

p2.jpg

p2.jpg

492 ms

p3.jpg

p3.jpg

495 ms

p4.jpg

p4.jpg

426 ms

p5.jpg

p5.jpg

490 ms

p6.jpg

p6.jpg

503 ms

p7.jpg

p7.jpg

566 ms

p8.jpg

p8.jpg

569 ms

p9.jpg

p9.jpg

570 ms

p10.jpg

p10.jpg

718 ms

p11.jpg

p11.jpg

572 ms

p12.jpg

p12.jpg

578 ms

p13.jpg

p13.jpg

643 ms

p14.jpg

p14.jpg

646 ms

p15.jpg

p15.jpg

647 ms

p16.jpg

p16.jpg

649 ms

p17.jpg

p17.jpg

655 ms

p18.jpg

p18.jpg

719 ms

p19.jpg

p19.jpg

721 ms

p20.jpg

p20.jpg

725 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

21 ms

font

font

118 ms

font

font

118 ms

font

font

160 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

621 ms

p21.jpg

p21.jpg

630 ms

p22.jpg

p22.jpg

692 ms

p23.jpg

p23.jpg

680 ms

13.jpg

13.jpg

677 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

606 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

42 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

603 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

587 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

655 ms

collect

collect

33 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

614 ms

js

js

62 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

537 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

537 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

534 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

536 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

543 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

528 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

465 ms

headerbg.png

headerbg.png

467 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

465 ms

waves.gif

waves.gif

689 ms

n1.png

n1.png

536 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

528 ms

n2.png

n2.png

466 ms

n4.png

n4.png

539 ms

sliderback.jpg

sliderback.jpg

464 ms

browser.png

browser.png

536 ms

flexslider-icon.woff

flexslider-icon.woff

81 ms

Accessibility Review

gcltechnologies.co.in accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gcltechnologies.co.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

gcltechnologies.co.in SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gcltechnologies.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gcltechnologies.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gcltechnologies.co.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GCL TECHNOLOGIES. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: