Tools & Wizards About Us
geebrand.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 34

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

geebrand.com

Page Load Speed

11.8 sec in total

First Response

3.7 sec

Resources Loaded

7.6 sec

Page Rendered

450 ms

geebrand.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Geebrand content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about geebrand.com

瑗垮????村????璁捐????搞???ㄨ??佃?:029-85421195?????瀹跺????绛???,????璁捐???绠＄??涓轰?浣???楂?绔?????绛???璁捐?????涓昏??VI璁捐?,LOGO璁捐?,绌洪?磋?璁?涓???搴?璁捐?绛?.

Visit geebrand.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Geebrand.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.7 sec and then it took 8.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

geebrand.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.382

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

geebrand.com

3728 ms

style.css

263 ms

public.css

497 ms

jQuery.js

751 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

506 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Geebrand.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Stat.xiaonaodai.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Youziku.oss-cn-beijing.aliyuncs.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Geebrand.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 165.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Geebrand.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 31.1 kB

  • Original 36.7 kB
  • After minification 25.1 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.6 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 116.4 kB

  • Original 3.5 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Geebrand images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 61.5 kB
  • After minification 61.5 kB
  • After compression 48.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 10.7 kB
  • After minification 10.7 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Geebrand.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (25%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Geebrand. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

geebrand.com

geebrand.com

3728 ms

style.css

style.css

263 ms

public.css

public.css

497 ms

jQuery.js

jQuery.js

751 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

506 ms

jquery.lazyload.js

jquery.lazyload.js

503 ms

jquery.superslide.js

jquery.superslide.js

505 ms

youziku.api.min.js

youziku.api.min.js

521 ms

font.js

font.js

1241 ms

index.js

index.js

1485 ms

stat.js

stat.js

1242 ms

u.php

u.php

246 ms

logo.png

logo.png

263 ms

close.png

close.png

254 ms

20187161832265508.jpg

20187161832265508.jpg

1516 ms

20187161844323838.jpg

20187161844323838.jpg

1000 ms

20187161874838213.jpg

20187161874838213.jpg

1537 ms

20187161881882473.jpg

20187161881882473.jpg

1510 ms

20187161883847383.jpg

20187161883847383.jpg

1760 ms

20187161885441725.jpg

20187161885441725.jpg

1289 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

1252 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

1500 ms

black.png

black.png

1547 ms

erweima.jpg

erweima.jpg

1749 ms

foot-logo.png

foot-logo.png

1761 ms

back2top.png

back2top.png

1774 ms

201871617502254682.jpg

201871617502254682.jpg

1793 ms

museo-light.woff

museo-light.woff

1805 ms

3819822c81a587aac2f273d2d5d881e0.backlist.json

3819822c81a587aac2f273d2d5d881e0.backlist.json

481 ms

2018112711474891939.jpg

2018112711474891939.jpg

518 ms

201811231121833248.jpg

201811231121833248.jpg

260 ms

2018112111304553998.jpg

2018112111304553998.jpg

497 ms

Accessibility Review

geebrand.com accessibility score

34

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

geebrand.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

geebrand.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GB2312

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Geebrand.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Geebrand.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

geebrand.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Geebrand. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: