4.6 sec in total
361 ms
4.1 sec
81 ms
Click here to check amazing Gestione Mare content for Italy. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gestionemare.com
Visit gestionemare.comWe analyzed Gestionemare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 361 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
gestionemare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
361 ms
2126 ms
241 ms
133 ms
265 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Gestionemare.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gestionemare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 78.0 kB (9%)
902.1 kB
824.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Gestionemare.com main page is 902.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 566.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gestione Mare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gestionemare.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (86%)
42
6
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gestione Mare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gestionemare.com
361 ms
www.gestionemare.com
2126 ms
hu-banner.min.js
241 ms
main.css
133 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
265 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
469 ms
swiper.min.css
362 ms
post-2733.css
360 ms
post-2924.css
363 ms
post-3285.css
366 ms
all.min.css
402 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
509 ms
style.min.css
628 ms
css
28 ms
widgets.css
493 ms
css
46 ms
jquery.min.js
640 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
530 ms
animations.min.css
589 ms
frontend.css
638 ms
app.js
664 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
722 ms
theme.min.js
723 ms
full-screen-mobile-menu.min.js
767 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
767 ms
ow-lightbox.min.js
768 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
890 ms
ow-slider.min.js
786 ms
scroll-effect.min.js
837 ms
scroll-top.min.js
896 ms
select.min.js
900 ms
flickr.min.js
897 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
916 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
960 ms
waypoints.min.js
1021 ms
core.min.js
1028 ms
frontend.min.js
1030 ms
underscore.min.js
1033 ms
wp-util.min.js
1042 ms
frontend.min.js
1079 ms
cropped-cropped-cropped-gestione_20mare_20logo_20EXE-1.png
608 ms
DSC_8199.jpg
969 ms
cropped-cropped-cropped-gestione_20mare_20logo_20EXE-1-150x150.png
502 ms
font
17 ms
font
151 ms
font
86 ms
font
119 ms
gestionemare.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
gestionemare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gestionemare.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gestionemare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gestionemare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gestionemare.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gestione Mare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: