Tools & Wizards About Us
gevaarsetiketten.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

gevaarsetiketten.com

Geostick Gevaarsetiketten | Altijd een passende oplossing - Het complete gevaarsetiketten assortiment

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

351 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

344 ms

gevaarsetiketten.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gevaarsetiketten.com now to see the best up-to-date Gevaarsetiketten content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gevaarsetiketten.com

Geostick is een specialist op het gebied van gevaarsetiketten levert gevaarsetiketten voor het vervoer van gevaarlijke goederen over de weg, het water en door de lucht in overeenstemming met de ADR en...

Visit gevaarsetiketten.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gevaarsetiketten.com page load time and found that the first response time was 351 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gevaarsetiketten.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.246

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

351 ms

js

73 ms

gtm.js

156 ms

rokbox.css

105 ms

menu-985adea21ad794c9a9424e85b46f7e3b.css

200 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Gevaarsetiketten.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (834 ms) belongs to the original domain Gevaarsetiketten.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 226.7 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gevaarsetiketten.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 60.5 kB

  • Original 72.5 kB
  • After minification 62.8 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 71.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gevaarsetiketten images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 72.5 kB

  • Original 276.1 kB
  • After minification 276.1 kB
  • After compression 203.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 72.5 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 21.9 kB

  • Original 108.6 kB
  • After minification 108.6 kB
  • After compression 86.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gevaarsetiketten.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (55%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gevaarsetiketten. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

351 ms

js

js

73 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

156 ms

rokbox.css

rokbox.css

105 ms

menu-985adea21ad794c9a9424e85b46f7e3b.css

menu-985adea21ad794c9a9424e85b46f7e3b.css

200 ms

grid-responsive.css

grid-responsive.css

283 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

285 ms

master-1a49efd2ea9285c0c8a705b689e7c4af.css

master-1a49efd2ea9285c0c8a705b689e7c4af.css

385 ms

mediaqueries.css

mediaqueries.css

294 ms

grid-flexbox-responsive.css

grid-flexbox-responsive.css

292 ms

module_default.css

module_default.css

364 ms

favth-bootstrap.css

favth-bootstrap.css

368 ms

favsocial.css

favsocial.css

381 ms

all.css

all.css

30 ms

vm-ltr-common.css

vm-ltr-common.css

382 ms

vm-ltr-site.css

vm-ltr-site.css

390 ms

vm-ltr-reviews.css

vm-ltr-reviews.css

446 ms

slideshow.css

slideshow.css

449 ms

finder.css

finder.css

471 ms

template.css

template.css

472 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

481 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

479 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

527 ms

caption.js

caption.js

531 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

651 ms

core.js

core.js

563 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

746 ms

rokbox.js

rokbox.js

566 ms

browser-engines.js

browser-engines.js

608 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

612 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

664 ms

sidemenu.js

sidemenu.js

665 ms

acymailing_module.js

acymailing_module.js

690 ms

keepalive.js

keepalive.js

693 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

741 ms

favth-bootstrap.js

favth-bootstrap.js

834 ms

mootools-mobile.js

mootools-mobile.js

777 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

777 ms

roksprocket.js

roksprocket.js

776 ms

moofx.js

moofx.js

689 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

25 ms

features.js

features.js

648 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

32 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

568 ms

update_cart.js

update_cart.js

572 ms

nl_nl.gif

nl_nl.gif

94 ms

slider-en-2023.jpg

slider-en-2023.jpg

273 ms

19108687_ml-1.jpg

19108687_ml-1.jpg

248 ms

29875787_ml-1.jpg

29875787_ml-1.jpg

184 ms

47826904_ml-1.jpg

47826904_ml-1.jpg

271 ms

50321685_ml-1.jpg

50321685_ml-1.jpg

103 ms

61628869_ml-1.jpg

61628869_ml-1.jpg

246 ms

IMO-Etiketten_0x250.png

IMO-Etiketten_0x250.png

188 ms

ADR-RID-etiketten_0x250.png

ADR-RID-etiketten_0x250.png

275 ms

IATA-ICAO-etiketten_0x250.png

IATA-ICAO-etiketten_0x250.png

280 ms

Behandelingsetiketten_0x250.png

Behandelingsetiketten_0x250.png

330 ms

GHS-etiketten_0x250.png

GHS-etiketten_0x250.png

331 ms

Blanco-etiketten_0x250.png

Blanco-etiketten_0x250.png

361 ms

animatedbooks.gif

animatedbooks.gif

364 ms

Formulieren_0x250.png

Formulieren_0x250.png

366 ms

vaste_kenmerking_0x250.png

vaste_kenmerking_0x250.png

372 ms

Lijmproducten_0x250.png

Lijmproducten_0x250.png

413 ms

900507000X_0x250.jpg

900507000X_0x250.jpg

414 ms

vanleeuwen-dangerousgoods-labels_0x250.png

vanleeuwen-dangerousgoods-labels_0x250.png

452 ms

VLG_LI_banner_1128__191_px_Facebook_Cover_Blog_Graphic_Instagram_Post_Square.png

VLG_LI_banner_1128__191_px_Facebook_Cover_Blog_Graphic_Instagram_Post_Square.png

546 ms

dg-office-icon.jpg

dg-office-icon.jpg

457 ms

vakqundig-logo.png

vakqundig-logo.png

464 ms

google-map.jpg

google-map.jpg

494 ms

van-leeuwen-gevaarsetiketten-logo.jpg

van-leeuwen-gevaarsetiketten-logo.jpg

495 ms

vanleeuwen_logo_en.svg

vanleeuwen_logo_en.svg

505 ms

dropdown-before.png

dropdown-before.png

509 ms

dropdown-after.png

dropdown-after.png

516 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

538 ms

IcoMoon.svg

IcoMoon.svg

557 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

19 ms

Accessibility Review

gevaarsetiketten.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

gevaarsetiketten.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gevaarsetiketten.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gevaarsetiketten.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gevaarsetiketten.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gevaarsetiketten.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gevaarsetiketten. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: