Tools & Wizards About Us
ghasitaram.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

ghasitaram.in

India's Trusted Brand in Traditional Sweets & Farsan Online at Best Quality - Ghasitaram

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

ghasitaram.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ghasitaram content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ghasitaram.in

Indulge in the authentic taste of India's traditional sweets and farsan (savory snacks) with Ghasitaram, your trusted online destination for high-quality, delectable treats. Shop their wide range of t...

Visit ghasitaram.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Ghasitaram.in page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ghasitaram.in performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ghasitaram.in

29 ms

ghasitaram.in

838 ms

remixicon.css

61 ms

css2

49 ms

main.639ed84e.css

563 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Ghasitaram.in, 42% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 23% (7 requests) were made to Cdn.ndhgo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.ndhgo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 58.3 kB (63%)

Content Size

92.9 kB

After Optimization

34.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ghasitaram.in main page is 92.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 36.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 31.9 kB

  • Original 36.0 kB
  • After minification 27.0 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 21.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ghasitaram images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 764 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 33.2 kB
  • After minification 32.1 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ghasitaram.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (73%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ghasitaram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ghasitaram.in

ghasitaram.in

29 ms

ghasitaram.in

ghasitaram.in

838 ms

remixicon.css

remixicon.css

61 ms

css2

css2

49 ms

main.639ed84e.css

main.639ed84e.css

563 ms

full_page_loader.css

full_page_loader.css

1326 ms

footer.css

footer.css

1348 ms

dependency_generator.js

dependency_generator.js

499 ms

js

js

120 ms

topology.css

topology.css

1346 ms

custom.css

custom.css

508 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1684 ms

xyz_0.04939000386183379.jpeg

xyz_0.04939000386183379.jpeg

39 ms

pay-v3.js

pay-v3.js

974 ms

3711808e-d91d-4d1a-92fe-5becb139ecca.png

3711808e-d91d-4d1a-92fe-5becb139ecca.png

47 ms

css2

css2

19 ms

css2

css2

18 ms

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mxEIgVG.ttf

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mxEIgVG.ttf

31 ms

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwjIgVG.ttf

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwjIgVG.ttf

37 ms

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwKIgVG.ttf

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwKIgVG.ttf

41 ms

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mx9IgVG.ttf

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mx9IgVG.ttf

189 ms

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myRJQVG.ttf

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myRJQVG.ttf

44 ms

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myjJQVG.ttf

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myjJQVG.ttf

87 ms

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mz9JQVG.ttf

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mz9JQVG.ttf

44 ms

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwjJQVG.ttf

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mwjJQVG.ttf

42 ms

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myjJAVG.ttf

92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myjJAVG.ttf

44 ms

6NUK8FKMIQOGaw6wjYT7ZHG_zsBBfhXtWmA.ttf

6NUK8FKMIQOGaw6wjYT7ZHG_zsBBfhXtWmA.ttf

73 ms

6NUK8FKMIQOGaw6wjYT7ZHG_zsBBfiftWmA.ttf

6NUK8FKMIQOGaw6wjYT7ZHG_zsBBfiftWmA.ttf

82 ms

6NUK8FKMIQOGaw6wjYT7ZHG_zsBBfsvqWmA.ttf

6NUK8FKMIQOGaw6wjYT7ZHG_zsBBfsvqWmA.ttf

72 ms

6NUK8FKMIQOGaw6wjYT7ZHG_zsBBfvLqWmA.ttf

6NUK8FKMIQOGaw6wjYT7ZHG_zsBBfvLqWmA.ttf

74 ms

remixicon.woff

remixicon.woff

14 ms

Accessibility Review

ghasitaram.in accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ghasitaram.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ghasitaram.in SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ghasitaram.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ghasitaram.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ghasitaram.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ghasitaram. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: