3.8 sec in total
948 ms
2.5 sec
335 ms
Visit ghcl.co.in now to see the best up-to-date GHCL content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ghcl.co.in
GHCL India is a leading manufacturing company for Industrial Salts and Soda Ash in India. We also export them to various countries.
Visit ghcl.co.inWe analyzed Ghcl.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 948 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
ghcl.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value13.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.9 s
1/100
10%
Value4,140 ms
1/100
30%
Value1.191
1/100
15%
Value24.4 s
0/100
10%
948 ms
89 ms
165 ms
168 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Ghcl.co.in, 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ghcl.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 311.5 kB (62%)
504.7 kB
193.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ghcl.co.in main page is 504.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 357.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GHCL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 240.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 240.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ghcl.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (58%)
55
23
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GHCL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ghcl.co.in
948 ms
owl.carousel.css
89 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
165 ms
fonts.css
168 ms
wpgmp-frontend.css
164 ms
styles.css
168 ms
frontend_style.css
177 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
179 ms
style.css
243 ms
genericons.css
325 ms
style.css
327 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
251 ms
jquery.js
356 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
266 ms
jsapi
19 ms
wpgmp-google-map.js
323 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
334 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
375 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
402 ms
responsive.css
408 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
422 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
422 ms
custom.js
441 ms
placeholder.js
463 ms
dynamic.css.php
815 ms
box-shortcodes.css
510 ms
jquery.form.min.js
513 ms
scripts.js
512 ms
masonry.min.js
535 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
536 ms
functions.js
560 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
574 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
583 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
615 ms
logo.png
308 ms
ghcl1.jpg
640 ms
a3.jpg
898 ms
thirdbanner-homepage.jpg
1023 ms
a-5.jpg
650 ms
sofa.jpg
1021 ms
1864606299.png
538 ms
grey.gif
576 ms
logo_small.png
656 ms
Removing-gende-160x120.jpg
724 ms
Mr.-R.S.Jalan-talks-about-TUFS-Technology-Up-gradation-Fund-Scheme-160x142.jpg
738 ms
AAUntitled-160x142.jpg
736 ms
marker_tracker.gif
799 ms
olive-logo.png
817 ms
lato-regular.woff
811 ms
sprite.png
837 ms
corebg.jpg
911 ms
spacer.png
849 ms
border.jpg
895 ms
lato-thin.woff
909 ms
Lato-Light.woff
934 ms
analytics.js
9 ms
youtubevideo.jpg
935 ms
Lato-Medium.woff
1027 ms
Lato-ThinItalic.woff
949 ms
dark-bg.png
672 ms
ajax-loader.gif
566 ms
ghcl.co.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ghcl.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ghcl.co.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ghcl.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ghcl.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ghcl.co.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GHCL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: