Tools & Wizards About Us
giantfood.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 2

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

giantfood.com

Giant | Groceries, Pharmacy, Pickup and Delivery

Page Load Speed

621 ms in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

508 ms

Page Rendered

79 ms

giantfood.com screenshot

About Website

Visit giantfood.com now to see the best up-to-date Giant Food content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about giantfood.com

Shop online at Giant and select same day pickup at one of our 150 stores. Sign up for an account and collect digital coupons and save!

Visit giantfood.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Giantfood.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 587 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

giantfood.com performance score

2

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value16,830 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.661

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value37.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

giantfood.com

34 ms

giantfood.com

46 ms

31kzAK6kGXOOf-J69N37XXnHKjU.js

20 ms

c.js

19 ms

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Giantfood.com, 45% (5 requests) were made to Static.captcha-delivery.com and 9% (1 request) were made to Ct.captcha-delivery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (379 ms) relates to the external source Static.captcha-delivery.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19.3 kB (33%)

Content Size

57.7 kB

After Optimization

38.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Giantfood.com main page is 57.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 42.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 49% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 42.2 kB
  • After minification 32.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Giant Food needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 11.2 kB
  • After minification 11.2 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 761 B

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.7 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giantfood.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 761 B or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Giant Food. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

giantfood.com

giantfood.com

34 ms

giantfood.com

giantfood.com

46 ms

31kzAK6kGXOOf-J69N37XXnHKjU.js

31kzAK6kGXOOf-J69N37XXnHKjU.js

20 ms

c.js

c.js

19 ms

23 ms

main.js

main.js

9 ms

index.css

index.css

20 ms

font-face.css

font-face.css

22 ms

logo.png

logo.png

379 ms

loading_spinner.gif

loading_spinner.gif

24 ms

roboto.woff

roboto.woff

3 ms

Accessibility Review

giantfood.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

giantfood.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

giantfood.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giantfood.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Giantfood.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

giantfood.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Giant Food. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: