8.6 sec in total
2.3 sec
6.1 sec
205 ms
Click here to check amazing Gi Board Review content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about giboardreview.com
The Steinberg Board Review in Gastroenterology & Best Practices Course provides video and audio lectures, study guides, and practice exams.
Visit giboardreview.comWe analyzed Giboardreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
giboardreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value17.3 s
0/100
10%
Value18.2 s
0/100
25%
Value21.3 s
0/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.13
82/100
15%
Value25.8 s
0/100
10%
2338 ms
271 ms
357 ms
349 ms
269 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Giboardreview.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Giboardreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (79%)
3.6 MB
757.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Giboardreview.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 102.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gi Board Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giboardreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (92%)
60
5
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gi Board Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.giboardreview.com
2338 ms
codepeople_shearch_in_place.min.css
271 ms
sdm_wp_styles.css
357 ms
eMember_style.css
349 ms
jquery.fileuploader.css
269 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
375 ms
style.min.css
330 ms
wpcdt-public.css
352 ms
style.css
352 ms
smoothness-jquery-ui.min.css
413 ms
ec-store.css
683 ms
css
45 ms
owl.carousel.css
434 ms
dashicons.min.css
597 ms
all.min.css
602 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
454 ms
style.min.css
496 ms
dflip.min.css
598 ms
fwduvp.css
538 ms
js_composer.min.css
663 ms
jquery.min.js
704 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
702 ms
codepeople_shearch_in_place.min.js
703 ms
jquery.external.lib.js
703 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.pack.js
747 ms
jquery.fileuploader.js
753 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
842 ms
jquery.libs.js
764 ms
tooltips.js
765 ms
sdm_wp_scripts.js
787 ms
track-the-click-public.js
830 ms
core.min.js
837 ms
accordion.min.js
1084 ms
datepicker.min.js
849 ms
ec-store.js
953 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
914 ms
js
73 ms
wp_eStore_style.css
848 ms
wp_pg_style.css
770 ms
animate.min.css
672 ms
eStore_read_form.js
738 ms
estore-multi-gateway-co.js
679 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
668 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
673 ms
theme.min.js
693 ms
drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js
736 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
837 ms
ow-lightbox.min.js
796 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
775 ms
ow-slider.min.js
755 ms
scroll-effect.min.js
699 ms
css
13 ms
scroll-top.min.js
671 ms
select.min.js
614 ms
dflip.min.js
663 ms
FWDUVP.js
752 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
581 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
557 ms
Banner2021B.png
131 ms
BillSteinbergLG.jpg
213 ms
e-commerce-symbol-on-a-computer-keyboard-black-PV7TGNB-300x129.jpg
175 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
29 ms
giboardreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
giboardreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
giboardreview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giboardreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Giboardreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
giboardreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gi Board Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: