1.5 sec in total
262 ms
855 ms
379 ms
Visit gibraltarselect.com now to see the best up-to-date Gibraltarselect content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gibraltarselect.com
Visit gibraltarselect.comWe analyzed Gibraltarselect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
gibraltarselect.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value1.5 s
100/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.326
35/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
262 ms
23 ms
51 ms
54 ms
54 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Gibraltarselect.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (303 ms) belongs to the original domain Gibraltarselect.com.
Page size can be reduced by 610.1 kB (47%)
1.3 MB
696.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Gibraltarselect.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 559.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gibraltarselect images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 150.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 150.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 425.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gibraltarselect.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 425.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (75%)
28
7
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gibraltarselect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gibraltarselect.com
262 ms
css
23 ms
frontend.css
51 ms
chosen.css
54 ms
frontend.css
54 ms
grid.css
39 ms
base.css
38 ms
layout.css
40 ms
shortcodes.css
56 ms
magnific-popup.css
73 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
83 ms
jobhaus.css
87 ms
custom.css
71 ms
jquery.js
73 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
72 ms
avia-compat.js
71 ms
avia.js
78 ms
shortcodes.js
202 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
76 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
79 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
78 ms
comment-reply.min.js
216 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
303 ms
GibSelect-MST_logo_web1-300x101.png
137 ms
hero_home_1.jpg
141 ms
Executive_circle-300x225.png
137 ms
People-problems_circle2-300x225.png
137 ms
Jobsearch_circle-300x225.png
139 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
42 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
42 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
42 ms
print.css
16 ms
gibraltarselect.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
gibraltarselect.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
gibraltarselect.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gibraltarselect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Gibraltarselect.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gibraltarselect.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gibraltarselect. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: