3.1 sec in total
125 ms
2.4 sec
520 ms
Click here to check amazing Gicia content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gicia.org
A trusted leader in third-party environmental, sustainability, certification & auditing,sustainability & certification auditing and testing.
Visit gicia.orgWe analyzed Gicia.org page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
gicia.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value1,080 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value15.5 s
7/100
10%
125 ms
426 ms
51 ms
110 ms
403 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Gicia.org, 8% (7 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gicia.org.
Page size can be reduced by 450.3 kB (31%)
1.5 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Gicia.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 958.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 123.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gicia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 319.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 319.2 kB or 33% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gicia.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (84%)
81
13
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gicia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gicia.org
125 ms
gicia.org
426 ms
gtm.js
51 ms
cursor.css
110 ms
ihover.css
403 ms
style.css
122 ms
all.css
137 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
124 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
312 ms
frontend.min.css
210 ms
swiper.min.css
237 ms
post-320.css
228 ms
all.min.css
240 ms
v4-shims.min.css
333 ms
post-621.css
361 ms
frontend.css
345 ms
post-234.css
344 ms
global.min.css
414 ms
header.min.css
439 ms
content.min.css
447 ms
footer.min.css
445 ms
menu-addon.css
470 ms
basic.min.css
498 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
545 ms
theme.min.css
550 ms
pum-site-styles.css
728 ms
css
57 ms
fontawesome.min.css
846 ms
solid.min.css
606 ms
brands.min.css
802 ms
style-front-end.css
652 ms
jquery.min.js
660 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
713 ms
v4-shims.min.js
755 ms
jquery.json.min.js
764 ms
gravityforms.min.js
841 ms
api.js
57 ms
utils.min.js
963 ms
js
86 ms
js
68 ms
adsbygoogle.js
74 ms
email-decode.min.js
759 ms
animations.min.css
961 ms
typed.js
863 ms
typed.fe.js
696 ms
navigation.min.js
1147 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1109 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
854 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
841 ms
dom-ready.min.js
836 ms
hooks.min.js
829 ms
i18n.min.js
860 ms
a11y.min.js
913 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
828 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
919 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
908 ms
core.min.js
903 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
903 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
895 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
869 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
865 ms
waypoints.min.js
841 ms
frontend.min.js
871 ms
css
13 ms
js
196 ms
js
194 ms
gtm.js
191 ms
gtm.js
294 ms
GICIALogo.jpg
492 ms
plant-buds-flowers-5830234.jpg
950 ms
leopard-cheetah-animal-world-3065479-p7hetf1fggcxtn217l63bpg75yofmzah4t3uoax4m8.jpg
522 ms
Campa-1-p7hdyql2e4d0vtmbctrgfy5l67w5emhv8ykbs6eppc.jpg
608 ms
clouds-sky-blue-21156-p03mn39qkicq606njt5yo219h87n8ghmq6jytis8f4.jpg
566 ms
download-150x150.png
509 ms
SRT_LOGO-removebg-preview_1_300x300-150x150.jpg
797 ms
Picture1_300x300-150x150.png
616 ms
show_ads_impl.js
212 ms
zrt_lookup.html
208 ms
222 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
345 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
465 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
672 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
434 ms
eicons.woff
481 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
563 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
599 ms
40140115.js
176 ms
ads
59 ms
25 ms
recaptcha__en.js
29 ms
gicia.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
gicia.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gicia.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gicia.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gicia.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
gicia.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gicia. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: