34.2 sec in total
615 ms
33.4 sec
193 ms
Visit gifok.ru now to see the best up-to-date Gifok content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gifok.ru
Visit gifok.ruWe analyzed Gifok.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 615 ms and then it took 33.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
gifok.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.8 s
90/100
10%
615 ms
287 ms
182 ms
197 ms
467 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Gifok.ru, 11% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (32.6 sec) relates to the external source Informer.yandex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (75%)
1.4 MB
358.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Gifok.ru main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 910.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gifok images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 192.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 192.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 839.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gifok.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 839.5 kB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (63%)
30
11
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gifok. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gifok.ru
615 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
287 ms
flashblock.css
182 ms
player.css
197 ms
style.css
467 ms
js_composer.css
1293 ms
soundmanager2-nodebug-jsmin.js
286 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
338 ms
jquery.js
590 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
364 ms
masonry.min.js
470 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
422 ms
scripts.js
451 ms
adsbygoogle.js
27 ms
2-e1452457281374.jpg
594 ms
no-right-click-images.js
500 ms
font-awesome.min.css
534 ms
wp-embed.min.js
548 ms
js_composer_front.js
591 ms
3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews
193 ms
3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews
32619 ms
icon-search-w.png
202 ms
1.jpg
399 ms
ca-pub-5722916883955715.js
123 ms
zrt_lookup.html
185 ms
show_ads_impl.js
118 ms
1.jpg
15322 ms
code.js
370 ms
not.gif
151 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
147 ms
watch.js
74 ms
2764.png
182 ms
ads
269 ms
osd.js
34 ms
ads
15122 ms
showcase
14892 ms
16098 ms
gifok.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
gifok.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gifok.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gifok.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gifok.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gifok.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gifok. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: