1.1 sec in total
64 ms
914 ms
153 ms
Visit gigapx.net now to see the best up-to-date Gigapx content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gigapx.net
Visit gigapx.netWe analyzed Gigapx.net page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
gigapx.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.2 s
99/100
10%
Value1.8 s
99/100
25%
Value1.2 s
100/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.038
100/100
15%
Value2.6 s
98/100
10%
64 ms
168 ms
23 ms
29 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Gigapx.net, 26% (7 requests) were made to Kontactr.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (168 ms) relates to the external source Kontactr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 236.5 kB (44%)
531.9 kB
295.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Gigapx.net main page is 531.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 295.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 815 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gigapx images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 188.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gigapx.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)
24
14
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gigapx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
gigapx.net
64 ms
kontactr.js
168 ms
gigasofia.jpg
23 ms
oryahovo1.jpg
29 ms
oryahovo2.jpg
32 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
facebox.css
84 ms
facebox.js
166 ms
189000
100 ms
counter.js
9 ms
t.php
148 ms
closelabel.png
83 ms
loading.gif
159 ms
xuser.css
88 ms
api.js
18 ms
jquery.min.js
3 ms
recaptcha__en.js
79 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
collect
64 ms
anchor
39 ms
styles__ltr.css
7 ms
s5G5viF55Zd620FDUE2o6cwnsrT1pToaK6kVmkloWvE.js
15 ms
webworker.js
26 ms
logo_48.png
25 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
100 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
101 ms
recaptcha__en.js
34 ms
gigapx.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
gigapx.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
gigapx.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
BG
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gigapx.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Bulgarian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gigapx.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gigapx.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gigapx. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: