4.4 sec in total
668 ms
3.6 sec
184 ms
Click here to check amazing Gimptalk content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gimptalk.com
Visit gimptalk.comWe analyzed Gimptalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 668 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Gimptalk.com rating and web reputation
gimptalk.com performance score
668 ms
92 ms
181 ms
181 ms
187 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Gimptalk.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Resources.infolinks.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Rt1502.infolinks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 732.9 kB (71%)
1.0 MB
296.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Gimptalk.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 838.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gimptalk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 603.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 603.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gimptalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 68.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (60%)
57
23
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gimptalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gimptalk.com
668 ms
ipb_help.css
92 ms
calendar_select.css
181 ms
ipb_common.css
181 ms
ipb_editor.css
187 ms
ipb_styles.css
369 ms
prototype.js
564 ms
ipb.js
496 ms
scriptaculous-cache.js
532 ms
ipb.lang.js
265 ms
infolinks_main.js
61 ms
ips.quickpm.js
90 ms
ips.hooks.js
92 ms
ips.board.js
98 ms
branding_bg.png
107 ms
logo.png
108 ms
help.png
111 ms
primarynav_bg.png
110 ms
search_expand.png
108 ms
search_icon.png
108 ms
advanced_search.png
179 ms
feed.png
181 ms
f_unread.png
185 ms
last_post.png
188 ms
user_popup.png
189 ms
tab_left.png
188 ms
tab_right.png
288 ms
gradient_bg.png
284 ms
cat_minimize.png
285 ms
user_sync.html
27 ms
usersyncup-an.html
32 ms
ice.js
161 ms
showad.js
30 ms
PugMaster
15 ms
pixel
19 ms
Pug
15 ms
cm
38 ms
usersync.aspx
19 ms
Pug
16 ms
Pug
20 ms
pixel
19 ms
Pug
15 ms
Pug
14 ms
Pug
14 ms
14567548256611
39 ms
ipb_print.css
92 ms
FBLIS.html
31 ms
doq.htm
46 ms
mapuid
17 ms
sdk.js
245 ms
loader.gif
194 ms
getads.htm
1240 ms
loader-bg.png
34 ms
logo.png
55 ms
echo.htm
141 ms
161 ms
xd_arbiter.php
90 ms
xd_arbiter.php
154 ms
quant.js
6 ms
pixel;r=1492683145;a=p-aRAyv335QWAKb;fpan=1;fpa=P0-174647478-1456754826120;ns=1;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456754826119;tzo=-180;ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gimptalk.com%2F;url=http%3A%2F%2Frouter.infolinks.com%2Fecho.htm;ogl=
7 ms
xd_arbiter.php
38 ms
gimptalk.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gimptalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gimptalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gimptalk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gimptalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: