Tools & Wizards About Us
gingerlime.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

gingerlime.com

Gingerlime

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

392 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

3.2 sec

gingerlime.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gingerlime content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gingerlime.com

Gingerlime

Visit gingerlime.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gingerlime.com page load time and found that the first response time was 392 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gingerlime.com performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

91/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gingerlime.com

392 ms

blog.gingerlime.com

731 ms

1140.css

162 ms

style.css

164 ms

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

168 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gingerlime.com, 70% (16 requests) were made to Blog.gingerlime.com and 26% (6 requests) were made to Dyt9j4djd5di6.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (801 ms) relates to the external source Blog.gingerlime.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 124.1 kB (59%)

Content Size

209.0 kB

After Optimization

84.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Gingerlime.com main page is 209.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 97.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 57.4 kB

  • Original 85.7 kB
  • After minification 85.7 kB
  • After compression 28.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 26.0 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gingerlime needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 62.6 kB

  • Original 97.4 kB
  • After minification 97.4 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.6 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (67%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gingerlime. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gingerlime.com

gingerlime.com

392 ms

blog.gingerlime.com

blog.gingerlime.com

731 ms

1140.css

1140.css

162 ms

style.css

style.css

164 ms

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

168 ms

09dPzEqs0EvPz0_PSU0syCzWS87PBYvp52QmFetnFZamFlXqG-qZ6xlCOXq5mXl6WcUA.js

09dPzEqs0EvPz0_PSU0syCzWS87PBYvp52QmFetnFZamFlXqG-qZ6xlCOXq5mXl6WcUA.js

385 ms

M9bPKixNLarUA5MA.js

M9bPKixNLarUA5MA.js

419 ms

ajaxize_this.js

ajaxize_this.js

183 ms

css3-mediaqueries.js

css3-mediaqueries.js

166 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

181 ms

script.js

script.js

242 ms

shCore.js

shCore.js

170 ms

shBrushPlain.js

shBrushPlain.js

168 ms

shBrushPhp.js

shBrushPhp.js

182 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

209 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

84 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

88 ms

slide1-150x150.png

slide1-150x150.png

114 ms

test_2-300x188.jpg

test_2-300x188.jpg

111 ms

css.php

css.php

111 ms

shCore.css

shCore.css

84 ms

shThemeEmacs.css

shThemeEmacs.css

84 ms

blog.gingerlime.com

blog.gingerlime.com

801 ms

Accessibility Review

gingerlime.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gingerlime.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gingerlime.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gingerlime.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gingerlime.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gingerlime.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gingerlime. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: