Tools & Wizards About Us
girlingjones.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

girlingjones.com

Construction Recruitment Consultants | Girling Jones

Page Load Speed

11.9 sec in total

First Response

2.7 sec

Resources Loaded

8.2 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

girlingjones.com screenshot

About Website

Visit girlingjones.com now to see the best up-to-date Girling Jones content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about girlingjones.com

Girling Jones are a specialist recruitment consultancy based in the South West for jobs in construction, construction consultancy and building maintenance.

Visit girlingjones.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Girlingjones.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

girlingjones.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,670 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

girlingjones.com

2662 ms

style.min.css

398 ms

styles.css

391 ms

main.css

392 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

390 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Girlingjones.com, 16% (10 requests) were made to Staging-girlingjones-com.stackstaging.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Girlingjones.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 248.7 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Girlingjones.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 58.9 kB

  • Original 75.1 kB
  • After minification 67.3 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 105.4 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Girling Jones images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 55.9 kB

  • Original 592.2 kB
  • After minification 592.2 kB
  • After compression 536.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 28.5 kB

  • Original 149.4 kB
  • After minification 149.4 kB
  • After compression 120.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Girlingjones.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.5 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (64%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Girling Jones. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

girlingjones.com

girlingjones.com

2662 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

398 ms

styles.css

styles.css

391 ms

main.css

main.css

392 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

390 ms

plyr.css

plyr.css

387 ms

main.css

main.css

516 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

724 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

734 ms

yhn8lku.css

yhn8lku.css

84 ms

js

js

65 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

718 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

719 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

857 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

1063 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

731 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1081 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1082 ms

index.js

index.js

1082 ms

index.js

index.js

1081 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

1209 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

1397 ms

api.js

api.js

41 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1413 ms

index.js

index.js

1411 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

1411 ms

plyr.js

plyr.js

1405 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

1611 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

1722 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

1750 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

1752 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

1781 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

1781 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

1943 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

2049 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

2091 ms

p.css

p.css

23 ms

icon-search_2x.png

icon-search_2x.png

442 ms

linkedin-white.png

linkedin-white.png

491 ms

logomark-jobs-1.png

logomark-jobs-1.png

447 ms

logomark-jobs-2.png

logomark-jobs-2.png

447 ms

logomark-jobs-3.png

logomark-jobs-3.png

489 ms

media-left-image.jpg

media-left-image.jpg

991 ms

media-right-image.jpg

media-right-image.jpg

839 ms

join-our-team-image.jpg

join-our-team-image.jpg

955 ms

google-reviews_2x.png

google-reviews_2x.png

614 ms

logomark-cta.png

logomark-cta.png

531 ms

close.png

close.png

1339 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

1361 ms

prev.png

prev.png

1358 ms

next.png

next.png

1527 ms

Logo.svg

Logo.svg

1628 ms

x-white.png

x-white.png

488 ms

facebook-white.png

facebook-white.png

489 ms

logomark-application.png

logomark-application.png

707 ms

d

d

28 ms

d

d

35 ms

d

d

35 ms

d

d

9 ms

d

d

3 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

27 ms

Accessibility Review

girlingjones.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

girlingjones.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

girlingjones.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Girlingjones.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Girlingjones.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

girlingjones.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Girling Jones. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: