6.5 sec in total
3 sec
3.2 sec
278 ms
Click here to check amazing Girls On Track Foundation content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about girlsontrackfoundation.org
Our 2020 Grant Program is now open for applications! Worthy organizations are invited to apply for funding to help you...
Visit girlsontrackfoundation.orgWe analyzed Girlsontrackfoundation.org page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
girlsontrackfoundation.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value6.3 s
41/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.048
99/100
15%
Value3.8 s
90/100
10%
2986 ms
15 ms
31 ms
25 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Girlsontrackfoundation.org, 23% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Girlsontrackfoundation.org.
Page size can be reduced by 31.3 kB (8%)
374.8 kB
343.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Girlsontrackfoundation.org main page is 374.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 232.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 296 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Girls On Track Foundation images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Girlsontrackfoundation.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (75%)
20
5
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Girls On Track Foundation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
girlsontrackfoundation.org
2986 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
15 ms
style.min.css
31 ms
font-awesome.min.css
25 ms
styles.css
19 ms
style.min.css
21 ms
css
20 ms
genericons.css
22 ms
style.css
25 ms
jquery.js
40 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
33 ms
scripts.js
33 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
34 ms
masonry.min.js
35 ms
flexslider.js
61 ms
global.js
61 ms
comment-reply.min.js
33 ms
wp-embed.min.js
36 ms
cropped-GOTF-header-BW-2.jpg
44 ms
long-logo-dark-1.png
43 ms
va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vvl4jO.ttf
8 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnZKveRhf_.ttf
16 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnLK3eRhf_.ttf
23 ms
Genericons.svg
11 ms
AAJ42mNgYGBkAIIztovOg+jz1w7shtEAVsEIvAAA
3 ms
wlppgwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJX1C1GDNNV.ttf
22 ms
wlp2gwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJfbwhW.ttf
22 ms
wlpogwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJfajhRK_M.ttf
20 ms
wlprgwHKFkZgtmSR3NB0oRJfajDqDuNS_LA.ttf
135 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
24 ms
girlsontrackfoundation.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
girlsontrackfoundation.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
girlsontrackfoundation.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Girlsontrackfoundation.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Girlsontrackfoundation.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
girlsontrackfoundation.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Girls On Track Foundation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: