4.2 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.2 sec
581 ms
Click here to check amazing GI Services content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about giservices.in
Visit giservices.inWe analyzed Giservices.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
giservices.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value15.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.336
33/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
1428 ms
189 ms
121 ms
130 ms
129 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Giservices.in, 2% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Giservices.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (29%)
4.1 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Giservices.in main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 465.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, GI Services needs image optimization as it can save up to 465.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 374.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 374.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 332.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giservices.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 332.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (58%)
40
17
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GI Services. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
giservices.in
1428 ms
bootstrap.css
189 ms
font-awesome.css
121 ms
icomoon.css
130 ms
swiper.css
129 ms
slider.css
74 ms
animate.css
183 ms
switcher.css
144 ms
owl.css
175 ms
default.css
170 ms
styles.css
264 ms
css.css
203 ms
logo.png
391 ms
about1.jpg
364 ms
service-1b.jpg
364 ms
service-2b.jpg
364 ms
service-3b.jpg
365 ms
service-4b.jpg
384 ms
map.png
356 ms
project-1b.jpg
378 ms
project-2b.jpg
364 ms
project-4b.jpg
385 ms
jquery_002.js
413 ms
bootstrap.js
426 ms
owl.js
454 ms
wow.js
424 ms
jquery_003.js
424 ms
waypoints.js
429 ms
tabs.js
457 ms
jquery.js
473 ms
swiper.js
509 ms
isotope.js
468 ms
switcher.js
475 ms
modernizr.js
501 ms
map.js
496 ms
main.js
688 ms
svg+xml;charset=utf-8,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg'%20viewBox%3D'0%200%2027%2044'%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D'M0%2C22L22%2C0l2.1%2C2.1L4.2%2C22l19.9%2C19.9L22%2C44L0%2C22L0%2C22L0%2C22z'%20fill%3D'%23ffffff'%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E
91 ms
slide1.jpg
448 ms
slide2.jpg
449 ms
160f00268cf98f.jpg
450 ms
slide4.jpg
454 ms
gans.php.jpg
449 ms
bg5.jpg
467 ms
bgred.jpg
452 ms
450 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
363 ms
icomoon.ttf
376 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
36 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
37 ms
giservices.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
giservices.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
giservices.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
ZX
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giservices.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Giservices.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
giservices.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GI Services. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: