8.3 sec in total
3.2 sec
4.5 sec
526 ms
Welcome to gisstec.com homepage info - get ready to check Gisstec best content right away, or after learning these important things about gisstec.com
Broaching Tools: Open keyway, square, hexagon and spline with Gisstec Broaching & Slotting Tools. Angle Heads: 90º, Slim, Tilting and Double Angle Heads. Add an axis to your machining center.
Visit gisstec.comWe analyzed Gisstec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.2 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
gisstec.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.093
91/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
3207 ms
62 ms
99 ms
364 ms
93 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Gisstec.com, 12% (11 requests) were made to Gisstec.de and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Gisstec.com.
Page size can be reduced by 216.7 kB (18%)
1.2 MB
984.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Gisstec.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 650.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gisstec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 45.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.2 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gisstec.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (72%)
83
23
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gisstec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gisstec.com
3207 ms
js
62 ms
style.min.css
99 ms
styles.css
364 ms
crellyslider.min.css
93 ms
style.css
127 ms
font-awesome.min.css
93 ms
ionicons.css
100 ms
elementor.css
164 ms
animate.css
168 ms
extras.css
164 ms
style.css
195 ms
39fe2195cd7e7c5d5232ccef15d51873.css
190 ms
e9a675acb0047b7a144a634b821c8655.css
227 ms
b0bc3631cf298e4d2523ba97d697c376.css
232 ms
5b161c6f6d96ac92a9219d6eeadcffad.css
238 ms
front.min.css
269 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
270 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
299 ms
frontend.min.css
326 ms
swiper.min.css
311 ms
all.min.css
376 ms
v4-shims.min.css
346 ms
global.css
489 ms
post-438.css
384 ms
google-fonts-1.css
404 ms
fontawesome.min.css
423 ms
solid.min.css
431 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
453 ms
jquery.min.js
442 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
506 ms
core.min.js
509 ms
jquery.crellyslider.min.js
511 ms
front.min.js
518 ms
v4-shims.min.js
524 ms
js
72 ms
animations.min.css
661 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
662 ms
email-decode.min.js
507 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
index.js
602 ms
index.js
599 ms
frontend.js
594 ms
navigation.js
595 ms
collect
16 ms
main.js
567 ms
collect
32 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
530 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
617 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
610 ms
waypoints.min.js
593 ms
swiper.min.js
584 ms
share-link.min.js
555 ms
dialog.min.js
549 ms
frontend.min.js
633 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
606 ms
underscore.min.js
592 ms
wp-util.min.js
561 ms
frontend.min.js
550 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
536 ms
mailcheck.min.js
591 ms
punycode.min.js
579 ms
utils.min.js
558 ms
wpforms.min.js
525 ms
js
137 ms
bosch-logo.jpg
247 ms
Gisstec-GmbH-Logo.gif
379 ms
Keyway-Broaching-Slotting-Gisstec.jpg
421 ms
Keyway-Broaching-Slotting-Workpiece-Gisstec.jpg
432 ms
Angle-Head-Gisstec-2.jpg
483 ms
Multispindle-Head-Drill-Gisstec.jpg
485 ms
Spline-Broaching-Slotting-Sample-2-Gisstec.jpg
482 ms
Hexagon-Broaching-Slotting-Sample-Gisstec.jpg
483 ms
Spline-Broaching-Slotting-Sample-Gisstec.jpg
526 ms
arcelor-mittal-logo.jpg
260 ms
federalmogul-logo.jpg
254 ms
fiat-logo-1.jpg
246 ms
lufthansa-technik-logo.jpg
255 ms
gates-logo-1.jpg
243 ms
lisi-aerospace-logo.jpg
257 ms
ford-logo.jpg
262 ms
mahle-logo.jpg
268 ms
Gisstec-Blog.png
274 ms
cropped-favicon-192x192.png
273 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
365 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
461 ms
ionicons.ttf
462 ms
overpass-light.woff
421 ms
overpass-extralight.woff
462 ms
overpass-regular.woff
398 ms
eicons.woff
484 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
531 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
530 ms
gisstec.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
gisstec.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gisstec.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gisstec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gisstec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gisstec.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gisstec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: