5.7 sec in total
548 ms
4.9 sec
259 ms
Welcome to githubranking.com homepage info - get ready to check Githubranking best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about githubranking.com
GitHub Ranking is a ranking for all GitHub users. You can see top 1000 users, organizations and repositories. Find your favorite user. See what is your rank.
Visit githubranking.comWe analyzed Githubranking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 548 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
githubranking.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value4.0 s
88/100
10%
548 ms
931 ms
839 ms
1194 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Githubranking.com, 66% (23 requests) were made to Avatars.githubusercontent.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Github-ranking.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Avatars.githubusercontent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 478.0 kB (21%)
2.3 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Githubranking.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 223.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Githubranking needs image optimization as it can save up to 223.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 112.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 112.1 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Githubranking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
29
29
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Githubranking. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
githubranking.com
548 ms
github-ranking.com
931 ms
application-042136283668b7b685a6d83d6c7dce9d.css
839 ms
application-6144d7ec9fd02c05c2d9490cffcd602f.js
1194 ms
css
57 ms
analytics.js
82 ms
170270
103 ms
4732
70 ms
12631
79 ms
25254
71 ms
119893
121 ms
230541
79 ms
2022803
99 ms
629429
81 ms
378
82 ms
66577
96 ms
1342004
89 ms
69631
111 ms
2918581
2108 ms
50278
108 ms
9919
109 ms
131524
1387 ms
70142
1645 ms
1136800
110 ms
139426
111 ms
82592
120 ms
10161
122 ms
1505683
125 ms
4223
128 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
68 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
84 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
93 ms
fontawesome-webfont-3503c9fdf7c16dcf3685c3b0b59a0414.woff
340 ms
collect
29 ms
nr-892.min.js
45 ms
githubranking.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
githubranking.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
githubranking.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Githubranking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Githubranking.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
githubranking.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Githubranking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: