4.7 sec in total
1.8 sec
2.2 sec
654 ms
Welcome to glamorousbyamanda.com homepage info - get ready to check Glamorousbyamanda best content right away, or after learning these important things about glamorousbyamanda.com
Visit glamorousbyamanda.comWe analyzed Glamorousbyamanda.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
glamorousbyamanda.com performance score
1847 ms
59 ms
7 ms
9 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Glamorousbyamanda.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Glamorousbyamanda.com.
Page size can be reduced by 913.5 kB (27%)
3.4 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Glamorousbyamanda.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 152 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glamorousbyamanda images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 586.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 586.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 287.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glamorousbyamanda.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 287.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (67%)
58
19
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glamorousbyamanda. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
glamorousbyamanda.com
1847 ms
css
59 ms
styles.css
7 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
9 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
27 ms
rgs.css
6 ms
font-awesome.min.css
10 ms
steadysets.css
21 ms
linecon.css
21 ms
style.css
58 ms
responsive.css
21 ms
jquery.js
29 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
26 ms
modernizr.js
25 ms
external-tracking.min.js
28 ms
ga.js
9 ms
ls1.jpg
41 ms
rl1.jpg
41 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
jquery.form.min.js
25 ms
scripts.js
28 ms
superfish.js
23 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
30 ms
easing.js
32 ms
respond.js
34 ms
swipe.min.js
37 ms
nicescroll.js
44 ms
sticky.js
42 ms
prettyPhoto.js
43 ms
flexslider.min.js
71 ms
isotope.min.js
72 ms
carouFredSel.min.js
77 ms
appear.js
76 ms
orbit.js
81 ms
init.js
84 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
94 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
82 ms
nectar-slider.js
89 ms
nectar-love.js
82 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
90 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
87 ms
jquery.ui.position.min.js
88 ms
jquery.ui.menu.min.js
91 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.min.js
91 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
87 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
88 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
132 ms
icomoon.woff
88 ms
11.jpg
134 ms
logoawards22.jpg
139 ms
icon_smile.gif
129 ms
1.jpg
141 ms
0071.jpg
131 ms
image1.jpg
133 ms
images1.jpg
118 ms
lash-u-lashes-large.jpg
120 ms
download.jpg
116 ms
Caron-Lab-Logo-High-Res.jpg
116 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
70 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
71 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
76 ms
SYDNEYMAKEUPARTIST.jpg
95 ms
nectar-loading.gif
52 ms
diagonal_line.png
52 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
50 ms
glamorousbyamanda.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glamorousbyamanda.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glamorousbyamanda.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
glamorousbyamanda.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glamorousbyamanda. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: