Tools & Wizards About Us
glams.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

glams.com

GLAMS - the Global Labelling Artwork Management System

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

346 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

431 ms

glams.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing GLAMS content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glams.com

GLAMS comes with a validation pack, meets all regulatory requirements, is easy to use and has proven results in reducing pharma artwork revision cycles.

Visit glams.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glams.com page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glams.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value820 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.121

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glams.com

346 ms

glams.com

2757 ms

bootstrap.min.css

301 ms

font-awesome.min.css

305 ms

jquery.remodal.css

299 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Glams.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to E2eg.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Glams.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 475.3 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

870.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glams.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 514.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 72.5 kB

  • Original 90.4 kB
  • After minification 86.8 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 121.9 kB

  • Original 428.5 kB
  • After minification 306.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, GLAMS needs image optimization as it can save up to 121.9 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 134.7 kB

  • Original 514.8 kB
  • After minification 514.5 kB
  • After compression 380.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.7 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 146.2 kB

  • Original 312.0 kB
  • After minification 274.4 kB
  • After compression 165.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glams.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.2 kB or 47% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (61%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GLAMS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

glams.com

glams.com

346 ms

glams.com

glams.com

2757 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

301 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

305 ms

jquery.remodal.css

jquery.remodal.css

299 ms

slider.css

slider.css

307 ms

styles.css

styles.css

344 ms

duplicate-page-and-post-admin.min.css

duplicate-page-and-post-admin.min.css

344 ms

settings.css

settings.css

400 ms

style.css

style.css

404 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

405 ms

fullcalendar.min.css

fullcalendar.min.css

403 ms

style.css

style.css

439 ms

css

css

33 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

548 ms

style.css

style.css

604 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

707 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

701 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

500 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

770 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

701 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

993 ms

moment.js

moment.js

808 ms

moment-timezone-with-data.js

moment-timezone-with-data.js

905 ms

jstz.min.js

jstz.min.js

802 ms

fullcalendar.min.js

fullcalendar.min.js

911 ms

locale-all.js

locale-all.js

1027 ms

app.js

app.js

1047 ms

style.css

style.css

1052 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1052 ms

jquery.remodal.js

jquery.remodal.js

1073 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1188 ms

css

css

32 ms

3156.js

3156.js

350 ms

css

css

17 ms

js_composer_tta.min.css

js_composer_tta.min.css

1072 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1094 ms

uk-cookie-consent-js.js

uk-cookie-consent-js.js

1094 ms

script.js

script.js

1096 ms

wpcf7-redirect-script.js

wpcf7-redirect-script.js

1095 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1128 ms

functions.js

functions.js

1126 ms

css

css

20 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

926 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

923 ms

vc-accordion.min.js

vc-accordion.min.js

918 ms

vc-tta-autoplay.min.js

vc-tta-autoplay.min.js

916 ms

vc-tabs.min.js

vc-tabs.min.js

974 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

1085 ms

css

css

18 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

140 ms

close-btn.svg

close-btn.svg

354 ms

logo-new.png

logo-new.png

399 ms

glams_enterprise_cover_sm.jpg

glams_enterprise_cover_sm.jpg

401 ms

banner-right-bg1.png

banner-right-bg1.png

399 ms

banner-left-bg.png

banner-left-bg.png

400 ms

banner-logo.png

banner-logo.png

550 ms

video.jpg

video.jpg

459 ms

Pharmaceutical-01.svg

Pharmaceutical-01.svg

129 ms

Veterinary-01.svg

Veterinary-01.svg

201 ms

Nutraceutical-01.svg

Nutraceutical-01.svg

219 ms

Medical-Devices-01.svg

Medical-Devices-01.svg

220 ms

top-icon-3.png

top-icon-3.png

400 ms

f-logo.png

f-logo.png

458 ms

global-dom-new.svg

global-dom-new.svg

429 ms

platformbg.png

platformbg.png

458 ms

icons-feat.svg

icons-feat.svg

458 ms

wheel-features.svg

wheel-features.svg

1200 ms

demoSecBg.jpg

demoSecBg.jpg

816 ms

non-compliance-new.svg

non-compliance-new.svg

519 ms

lack-of-process-new.svg

lack-of-process-new.svg

677 ms

full-transnew.svg

full-transnew.svg

678 ms

global-dom-new.svg

global-dom-new.svg

679 ms

HelveticaNeue%20Light.woff

HelveticaNeue%20Light.woff

596 ms

helvetica-neue-regular.woff

helvetica-neue-regular.woff

596 ms

helvetica-bold.woff

helvetica-bold.woff

729 ms

century-gothic-bold.woff

century-gothic-bold.woff

729 ms

century-gothic-bold.woff

century-gothic-bold.woff

729 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

920 ms

Pharmaceutical-01.svg

Pharmaceutical-01.svg

820 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

908 ms

centralised-img.svg

centralised-img.svg

802 ms

Veterinary-01.svg

Veterinary-01.svg

753 ms

Nutraceutical-01.svg

Nutraceutical-01.svg

838 ms

Medical-Devices-01.svg

Medical-Devices-01.svg

839 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

773 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

857 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

854 ms

2714.svg

2714.svg

44 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

102 ms

Accessibility Review

glams.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

glams.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

glams.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glams.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glams.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glams.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GLAMS. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: