Tools & Wizards About Us
glasvezel-vergelijken.nl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

glasvezel-vergelijken.nl

Glasvezel Internet Vergelijken | Glasvezel-vergelijken.nl 2021 - Glasvezel-Vergelijken.nl

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

260 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

215 ms

glasvezel-vergelijken.nl screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Glasvezel Vergelijken content for Netherlands. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glasvezel-vergelijken.nl

Het meest complete aanbod aan Glasvezel-, DSL en Kabel providers vergelijken. De beste vergelijker voor het 100% glasvezelnetwerk! Geen glasvezel aanwezig? Niet getreurd, ook DSL en kabel nemen wij da...

Visit glasvezel-vergelijken.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Glasvezel-vergelijken.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glasvezel-vergelijken.nl performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

glasvezel-vergelijken.nl

260 ms

www.glasvezel-vergelijken.nl

849 ms

css

56 ms

application-dad5c70b8723dfb8cfd6ce1af2892142.css

105 ms

application-a97e74d60c2ac6ceb0e726bb6293aeb4.js

458 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Glasvezel-vergelijken.nl, 7% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Ad.zanox.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (867 ms) relates to the external source Ad.zanox.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 731.1 kB (63%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

427.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glasvezel-vergelijken.nl main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 702.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 16.0 kB

  • Original 21.7 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 64.7 kB

  • Original 210.2 kB
  • After minification 145.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Glasvezel Vergelijken needs image optimization as it can save up to 64.7 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 456.6 kB

  • Original 702.4 kB
  • After minification 702.4 kB
  • After compression 245.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 456.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 193.9 kB

  • Original 223.9 kB
  • After minification 223.5 kB
  • After compression 30.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glasvezel-vergelijken.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 193.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (38%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glasvezel Vergelijken. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

glasvezel-vergelijken.nl

glasvezel-vergelijken.nl

260 ms

www.glasvezel-vergelijken.nl

www.glasvezel-vergelijken.nl

849 ms

css

css

56 ms

application-dad5c70b8723dfb8cfd6ce1af2892142.css

application-dad5c70b8723dfb8cfd6ce1af2892142.css

105 ms

application-a97e74d60c2ac6ceb0e726bb6293aeb4.js

application-a97e74d60c2ac6ceb0e726bb6293aeb4.js

458 ms

qshops-fbc00d03078f682aa109c62542e5d70e.png

qshops-fbc00d03078f682aa109c62542e5d70e.png

110 ms

glasvezel-vergelijken-74d35aee12c90ea9675d22d2930ae444.png

glasvezel-vergelijken-74d35aee12c90ea9675d22d2930ae444.png

111 ms

s-d883576d94e02a930f750a2ce396bfe8.png

s-d883576d94e02a930f750a2ce396bfe8.png

273 ms

s-4da3b9837e9235295dc0c82cd28fbf67.png

s-4da3b9837e9235295dc0c82cd28fbf67.png

224 ms

s-03e518c2c6f53a52bc41bb19a83c2fec.png

s-03e518c2c6f53a52bc41bb19a83c2fec.png

352 ms

s-4d6409dea967c6048730525c930bb34f.png

s-4d6409dea967c6048730525c930bb34f.png

356 ms

s-426df13312f3981a9330c40ec37cf24c.png

s-426df13312f3981a9330c40ec37cf24c.png

433 ms

s-5fca87f85b1e743c43f9139219672569.png

s-5fca87f85b1e743c43f9139219672569.png

352 ms

s-fc70122b9d60c873d83b34e44258153a.png

s-fc70122b9d60c873d83b34e44258153a.png

352 ms

s-9f8e0e8a764992c060459e3903700a0c.png

s-9f8e0e8a764992c060459e3903700a0c.png

356 ms

s-fe329d0d4193d3be7a2262ddfdd4772f.png

s-fe329d0d4193d3be7a2262ddfdd4772f.png

628 ms

s-074e661f84cef2ebdbf08a241d1625b7.png

s-074e661f84cef2ebdbf08a241d1625b7.png

456 ms

s-48f8432e3d533e0ffc6d3b6d9eade36e.png

s-48f8432e3d533e0ffc6d3b6d9eade36e.png

474 ms

s-78234a1bdadac3b5fe6ac5adb5cf8f8d.png

s-78234a1bdadac3b5fe6ac5adb5cf8f8d.png

476 ms

s-dce846ddd2146b56c67697e4bbd11491.png

s-dce846ddd2146b56c67697e4bbd11491.png

473 ms

s-c5e75910b77fe79f151c8b8e10d72e7c.png

s-c5e75910b77fe79f151c8b8e10d72e7c.png

622 ms

s-86f027e351db1af372fd567eb68d2f57.png

s-86f027e351db1af372fd567eb68d2f57.png

623 ms

s-ed31ebe458524cd5e6a8e09fe0d4e080.png

s-ed31ebe458524cd5e6a8e09fe0d4e080.png

622 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

132 ms

121759904

121759904

172 ms

background-0c07c6cd92f70225a87eed64a7dbd5a5.jpg

background-0c07c6cd92f70225a87eed64a7dbd5a5.jpg

737 ms

l-e12640e21fac0992071c84d6d90903c6.png

l-e12640e21fac0992071c84d6d90903c6.png

697 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

43 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

57 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

84 ms

entypo-926dbfc1783a49b3cfd2017592eb8fee.woff

entypo-926dbfc1783a49b3cfd2017592eb8fee.woff

638 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

77 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

118 ms

2a5a1c7f-3da8-4c2f-bb8f-72d054a7eca3.js

2a5a1c7f-3da8-4c2f-bb8f-72d054a7eca3.js

324 ms

player.js

player.js

169 ms

player.css

player.css

149 ms

ga.js

ga.js

120 ms

vuid.min.js

vuid.min.js

238 ms

collect

collect

47 ms

collect

collect

207 ms

156 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

96 ms

proxy.html

proxy.html

60 ms

510258952.webp

510258952.webp

228 ms

9055551_60x60.jpg

9055551_60x60.jpg

182 ms

46 ms

widget_v2.134.js

widget_v2.134.js

13 ms

__$$__stringtable_lang_nl.js

__$$__stringtable_lang_nl.js

31 ms

nr-885.min.js

nr-885.min.js

44 ms

689d5b4562

689d5b4562

115 ms

onepixel.gif

onepixel.gif

645 ms

onepixel.gif

onepixel.gif

652 ms

300-250_Affiliate-GIF.GIF

300-250_Affiliate-GIF.GIF

867 ms

onepixel.gif

onepixel.gif

646 ms

avatar_simple_visitor.png

avatar_simple_visitor.png

74 ms

aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==

aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==

2 ms

SEO Factors

glasvezel-vergelijken.nl SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glasvezel-vergelijken.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glasvezel-vergelijken.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glasvezel-vergelijken.nl

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glasvezel Vergelijken. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: