Tools & Wizards About Us
glf.it screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

glf.it

Grandi Lavori Fincosit S.p.A.

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

699 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

205 ms

glf.it screenshot

About Website

Welcome to glf.it homepage info - get ready to check Glf best content for Italy right away, or after learning these important things about glf.it

In Grandi Lavori Fincosit sono integrate le sinergie e le specializzazioni dei più importanti settori dell'ingegneria civile: Edilizia, Infrastrutture, Lavori Marittimi, Impianti Idraulici e di produz...

Visit glf.it

Key Findings

We analyzed Glf.it page load time and found that the first response time was 699 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glf.it performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

699 ms

2j_tabs.css

206 ms

2j_news_slider.css

209 ms

jq_last.js

413 ms

2j.ui.base.js

214 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Glf.it, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Glf.it.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 63.0 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glf.it main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 34.8 kB

  • Original 43.9 kB
  • After minification 40.8 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 112.9 kB
  • After minification 112.9 kB
  • After compression 109.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 27.8 kB
  • After minification 27.8 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glf.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (72%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

699 ms

2j_tabs.css

2j_tabs.css

206 ms

2j_news_slider.css

2j_news_slider.css

209 ms

jq_last.js

jq_last.js

413 ms

2j.ui.base.js

2j.ui.base.js

214 ms

2j.ui.tabs.js

2j.ui.tabs.js

214 ms

j.e.js

j.e.js

216 ms

jq.w.js

jq.w.js

308 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

726 ms

caption.js

caption.js

320 ms

system.css

system.css

322 ms

general.css

general.css

323 ms

suckerfish.css

suckerfish.css

410 ms

layout.css

layout.css

426 ms

template.css

template.css

429 ms

menu.css

menu.css

432 ms

module.css

module.css

513 ms

color.css

color.css

514 ms

moomenu.js

moomenu.js

533 ms

tips.js

tips.js

535 ms

skitter.styles.css

skitter.styles.css

438 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

826 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

516 ms

jquery.skitter.min.js

jquery.skitter.min.js

647 ms

css

css

20 ms

1568f1e0b153a900a4db89b51358e53d.js

1568f1e0b153a900a4db89b51358e53d.js

541 ms

def.css

def.css

445 ms

style1.tabs.css

style1.tabs.css

517 ms

style2.tabs.css

style2.tabs.css

548 ms

style3.tabs.css

style3.tabs.css

554 ms

style4.tabs.css

style4.tabs.css

619 ms

style5.tabs.css

style5.tabs.css

623 ms

style6.tabs.css

style6.tabs.css

652 ms

style7.tabs.css

style7.tabs.css

655 ms

style8.tabs.css

style8.tabs.css

661 ms

style9.tabs.css

style9.tabs.css

722 ms

style10.tabs.css

style10.tabs.css

725 ms

style11.tabs.css

style11.tabs.css

758 ms

style12.tabs.css

style12.tabs.css

762 ms

style13.tabs.css

style13.tabs.css

768 ms

style14.tabs.css

style14.tabs.css

819 ms

style15.tabs.css

style15.tabs.css

817 ms

style16.tabs.css

style16.tabs.css

819 ms

style17.tabs.css

style17.tabs.css

764 ms

style18.tabs.css

style18.tabs.css

756 ms

style19.tabs.css

style19.tabs.css

762 ms

style20.tabs.css

style20.tabs.css

810 ms

style21.tabs.css

style21.tabs.css

725 ms

style99.tabs.css

style99.tabs.css

726 ms

body_bg.jpg

body_bg.jpg

749 ms

logo.png

logo.png

109 ms

search_bg.png

search_bg.png

110 ms

shadow_left.gif

shadow_left.gif

103 ms

suckerfish_bg.png

suckerfish_bg.png

104 ms

menu_divider.gif

menu_divider.gif

104 ms

active.gif

active.gif

206 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

514 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

411 ms

03.jpg

03.jpg

535 ms

04.jpg

04.jpg

690 ms

05.jpg

05.jpg

409 ms

06.jpg

06.jpg

716 ms

07.jpg

07.jpg

819 ms

08.jpg

08.jpg

1025 ms

09.jpg

09.jpg

856 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

1230 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

1022 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

1066 ms

13.jpg

13.jpg

1125 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

963 ms

15.jpg

15.jpg

1284 ms

spacer55555.gif

spacer55555.gif

1125 ms

spacer55555.gif

spacer55555.gif

1127 ms

banda-storiche.gif

banda-storiche.gif

1173 ms

divisorio_home.gif

divisorio_home.gif

1194 ms

shadow_right.gif

shadow_right.gif

1194 ms

bottom_bg.gif

bottom_bg.gif

1195 ms

prev.png

prev.png

1219 ms

next.png

next.png

1268 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

1269 ms

Accessibility Review

glf.it accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

glf.it best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

glf.it SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glf.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glf.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glf.it

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: