4.4 sec in total
1.8 sec
2.5 sec
62 ms
Visit glitterex.com now to see the best up-to-date Glitterex content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glitterex.com
Glitterex Corporation is a US manufacturer of cosmetic and industrial glitter, leading the industry since 1963.
Visit glitterex.comWe analyzed Glitterex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
glitterex.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value9.0 s
34/100
10%
1836 ms
52 ms
58 ms
52 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Glitterex.com, 39% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Glitterex.com.
Page size can be reduced by 234.9 kB (41%)
578.2 kB
343.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Glitterex.com main page is 578.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 310.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 232.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 232.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glitterex images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (48%)
23
12
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glitterex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.glitterex.com
1836 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
52 ms
minified.js
58 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
52 ms
polyfill.min.js
56 ms
thunderbolt-commons.24e46262.bundle.min.js
41 ms
main.544019c6.bundle.min.js
146 ms
lodash.min.js
147 ms
react.production.min.js
39 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
126 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
147 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
147 ms
c0c57b_a6c9cce964304f72a03b5cb6871438d6~mv2.gif
73 ms
bundle.min.js
68 ms
c0c57b_70dbd9a033eb4e0d98459991cc3ef70d~mv2_d_5184_3456_s_4_2.jpeg
241 ms
1e47b2_8f709af9d3744b8c8ac17f27366df93a.jpg
86 ms
c0c57b_e5f38de01f4948b39575aa987f750731~mv2.jpg
86 ms
c0c57b_63b433ca2ee84f76afad4a9fe86c34e2~mv2_d_3689_2765_s_4_2.jpeg
311 ms
c0c57b_775dfdce354c4ebc9fa34737f354f94d~mv2_d_4500_3000_s_4_2.jpeg
269 ms
c0c57b_33378a4455f24fbfbe3bf1d00980fbf6~mv2.jpg
260 ms
111 ms
117 ms
117 ms
112 ms
111 ms
113 ms
159 ms
159 ms
156 ms
160 ms
155 ms
153 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
16 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
12 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
4 ms
bolt-performance
21 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
7 ms
glitterex.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
glitterex.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
glitterex.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glitterex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glitterex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
glitterex.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glitterex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: