Tools & Wizards About Us
glossh.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

glossh.com

สล็อตเว็บตรง pgslot เปิดประสบการณ์สุดพิเศษกับสล็อตเว็บตรง ความสนุกและโอกาสใหญ่รออยู่

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

621 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

142 ms

glossh.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to glossh.com homepage info - get ready to check Glossh best content right away, or after learning these important things about glossh.com

สล็อตเว็บตรง pgslot เป็นเกมสล็อตออนไลน์ที่ตอบโจทย์ความสนุกและความตื่นเต้นของผู้เล่นที่กำลังมองหาโอกาสในการชนะรางวัลใหญ่ อ่านบทความนี้เพื่อรับข้อมูลเกี่ยวกับเกมสล็อตที่ได้รับความนิยม โปรโมชั่น และเคล็ด...

Visit glossh.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glossh.com page load time and found that the first response time was 621 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glossh.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glossh.com

621 ms

glossh.com

1047 ms

v0.js

22 ms

168Galaxy.webp

1050 ms

Joker123-7.webp

1052 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Glossh.com, 33% (3 requests) were made to 168galaxy.io and 33% (3 requests) were made to 168galaxy.today. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source 168galaxy.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.0 kB (28%)

Content Size

129.7 kB

After Optimization

93.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Glossh.com main page is 129.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 86.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 36.0 kB

  • Original 43.6 kB
  • After minification 41.3 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 86.1 kB
  • After minification 86.1 kB
  • After compression 86.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glossh. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

glossh.com

glossh.com

621 ms

glossh.com

glossh.com

1047 ms

v0.js

v0.js

22 ms

168Galaxy.webp

168Galaxy.webp

1050 ms

Joker123-7.webp

Joker123-7.webp

1052 ms

Joker123-2.webp

Joker123-2.webp

1306 ms

168Galaxy.webp

168Galaxy.webp

361 ms

Joker123-7.webp

Joker123-7.webp

538 ms

Joker123-2.webp

Joker123-2.webp

362 ms

Accessibility Review

glossh.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

glossh.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

glossh.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TH

  • Language Claimed

    TH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glossh.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Thai is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glossh.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glossh.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glossh. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: