Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    38% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

glwd.org

Medically tailored meals for New Yorkers living with serious illness | God's Love We Deliver

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

628 ms

Page Rendered

2.5 sec

glwd.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Glwd content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glwd.org

God’s Love We Deliver cooks and home-delivers nutritious, medically tailored meals for people too sick to shop or cook for themselves.

Visit glwd.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Glwd.org page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glwd.org performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value12,520 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value44.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glwd.org

14 ms

www.glwd.org

20 ms

formidableforms.css

8 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

25 ms

all.min.js

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Glwd.org, 66% (49 requests) were made to E1.nmcdn.io and 5% (4 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (300 ms) relates to the external source E1.nmcdn.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.3 MB (36%)

Content Size

56.4 MB

After Optimization

36.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Glwd.org main page is 56.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 55.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 216.7 kB

  • Original 266.1 kB
  • After minification 248.2 kB
  • After compression 49.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 216.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 20.0 MB

  • Original 55.7 MB
  • After minification 35.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Glwd needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.0 MB or 36% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 286.4 kB
  • After minification 286.4 kB
  • After compression 284.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 180.2 kB
  • After minification 180.2 kB
  • After compression 152.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glwd.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (18%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

56

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glwd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

glwd.org accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

glwd.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

glwd.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glwd.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glwd.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glwd. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: