Tools & Wizards About Us
glype.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

glype.com

Access Denied

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

638 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

4.2 sec

glype.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Glype content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about glype.com

Visit glype.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glype.com page load time and found that the first response time was 638 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glype.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,240 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glype.com

638 ms

www.glype.com

474 ms

detector.php

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Glype.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (638 ms) belongs to the original domain Glype.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.6 kB (62%)

Content Size

59.5 kB

After Optimization

22.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Glype.com main page is 59.5 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 54.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 868 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.7 kB
  • After compression 883 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 868 B or 50% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glype images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 54.9 kB
  • After minification 54.9 kB
  • After compression 19.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • Images

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glype. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

glype.com

glype.com

638 ms

www.glype.com

www.glype.com

474 ms

detector.php

detector.php

60 ms

Accessibility Review

glype.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

glype.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

glype.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glype.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glype.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

glype.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glype. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: