Tools & Wizards About Us
goodeck.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

goodeck.ru

Купить террасную доску из древесно-полимерного композита по цене производителя от Goodeck

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

448 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

474 ms

goodeck.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Goodeck content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about goodeck.ru

Декинг ДПК и другая продукция из древесно-полимерного композита на сайте компании GOODECK. Большой выбор фактур и цветовых решений. Выгодные цены, проектирование, доставка и монтаж.

Visit goodeck.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodeck.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 448 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodeck.ru performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,290 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.071

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

goodeck.ru

448 ms

goodeck.ru

831 ms

jquery.compiled.js

328 ms

guest.js

312 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

322 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Goodeck.ru, 4% (3 requests) were made to Code.jivosite.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Goodeck.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 104.8 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Goodeck.ru main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 737.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 36.3 kB

  • Original 47.9 kB
  • After minification 47.6 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 432.1 kB
  • After minification 430.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Goodeck images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 62.4 kB

  • Original 737.4 kB
  • After minification 735.6 kB
  • After compression 674.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 14.6 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodeck.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (43%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

39

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goodeck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

goodeck.ru

goodeck.ru

448 ms

goodeck.ru

goodeck.ru

831 ms

jquery.compiled.js

jquery.compiled.js

328 ms

guest.js

guest.js

312 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

322 ms

437 ms

671 ms

api.js

api.js

34 ms

ui.all.css

ui.all.css

322 ms

calendar.css

calendar.css

415 ms

logo.png

logo.png

176 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

85 ms

cart.png

cart.png

108 ms

calc.svg

calc.svg

109 ms

shok_cena_banner2_1.jpg

shok_cena_banner2_1.jpg

348 ms

raschet.jpg

raschet.jpg

347 ms

podsvetka.jpg

podsvetka.jpg

791 ms

45fd4dd09d60154703eeb069bef868eb.jpg

45fd4dd09d60154703eeb069bef868eb.jpg

270 ms

71eec342d1a32115f9f522d6704e12f6.jpg

71eec342d1a32115f9f522d6704e12f6.jpg

269 ms

5e5643eed84140ec79b79a3f8b03df97.jpg

5e5643eed84140ec79b79a3f8b03df97.jpg

346 ms

fc80c689a65e07dfa9622a27e91bccc4.jpg

fc80c689a65e07dfa9622a27e91bccc4.jpg

347 ms

2f402aad71fb7346653c6129798c88e7.jpg

2f402aad71fb7346653c6129798c88e7.jpg

348 ms

6114ee0cec8a63663ad70df631549bf2.jpg

6114ee0cec8a63663ad70df631549bf2.jpg

415 ms

5ffd12e97920f0d4e7505cddf8c540b8.jpg

5ffd12e97920f0d4e7505cddf8c540b8.jpg

412 ms

8eda1f599c09605186a06d8106815c2a.jpg

8eda1f599c09605186a06d8106815c2a.jpg

428 ms

1.svg

1.svg

429 ms

2.svg

2.svg

431 ms

3.svg

3.svg

516 ms

4.svg

4.svg

522 ms

5.svg

5.svg

536 ms

6.svg

6.svg

537 ms

7.svg

7.svg

538 ms

8.svg

8.svg

619 ms

9.svg

9.svg

629 ms

10.svg

10.svg

642 ms

11.svg

11.svg

644 ms

12.svg

12.svg

646 ms

production.png

production.png

722 ms

light-bulb.png

light-bulb.png

736 ms

green-case.png

green-case.png

748 ms

01.jpg

01.jpg

751 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

967 ms

03.jpg

03.jpg

825 ms

05.jpg

05.jpg

844 ms

06.jpg

06.jpg

855 ms

watch.js

watch.js

7 ms

gNVPiDi9R5

gNVPiDi9R5

238 ms

vk.jpg

vk.jpg

821 ms

arial.woff

arial.woff

4188 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

928 ms

robotoslab-bold.woff

robotoslab-bold.woff

847 ms

js

js

70 ms

ui.base.css

ui.base.css

697 ms

ui.theme.css

ui.theme.css

701 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

28 ms

ui.datepicker.css

ui.datepicker.css

793 ms

gNVPiDi9R5

gNVPiDi9R5

323 ms

jquery.jgrowl.css

jquery.jgrowl.css

727 ms

p.jpg

p.jpg

729 ms

yt.jpg

yt.jpg

728 ms

pr_lebel_hit.png

pr_lebel_hit.png

791 ms

zayav.png

zayav.png

823 ms

pr_lebel_add.png

pr_lebel_add.png

766 ms

gNVPiDi9R5

gNVPiDi9R5

552 ms

ui.core.css

ui.core.css

216 ms

ui.accordion.css

ui.accordion.css

217 ms

ui.dialog.css

ui.dialog.css

276 ms

ui.progressbar.css

ui.progressbar.css

312 ms

ui.resizable.css

ui.resizable.css

319 ms

ui.slider.css

ui.slider.css

323 ms

ui.tabs.css

ui.tabs.css

323 ms

print.css

print.css

109 ms

bundle_ru_RU.js

bundle_ru_RU.js

53 ms

Accessibility Review

goodeck.ru accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

goodeck.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

goodeck.ru SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodeck.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Goodeck.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

goodeck.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goodeck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: