4.9 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.3 sec
220 ms
Welcome to goodfortesting.com homepage info - get ready to check Goodfortesting best content right away, or after learning these important things about goodfortesting.com
Lewis SEO Company has been serving businesses of all sizes since 2008. We deliver top results, we would like to show you how.
Visit goodfortesting.comWe analyzed Goodfortesting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
goodfortesting.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.5 s
0/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value15.2 s
1/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.146
77/100
15%
Value18.2 s
3/100
10%
1387 ms
64 ms
51 ms
77 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Goodfortesting.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Goodfortesting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (62%)
3.9 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Goodfortesting.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Goodfortesting images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodfortesting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (76%)
46
11
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goodfortesting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
goodfortesting.com
1387 ms
style.min.css
64 ms
fancybox.css
51 ms
bootstrap.min.css
77 ms
bsnav.min.css
51 ms
font-awesome.min.css
48 ms
style.css
70 ms
flaticon.css
71 ms
style.css
152 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
100 ms
jquery-ui.css
105 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
121 ms
css2
36 ms
css2
50 ms
css2
53 ms
all.css
191 ms
js_composer.min.css
172 ms
v4-shims.css
200 ms
jquery.min.js
134 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
119 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
124 ms
js
78 ms
rs6.css
87 ms
lawnella-script.js
80 ms
rbtools.min.js
91 ms
rs6.min.js
144 ms
popper.min.js
116 ms
bootstrap.min.js
141 ms
bsnav.min.js
141 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
141 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
142 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
144 ms
jquery-ui.js
143 ms
script.js
142 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
142 ms
plugins.js
144 ms
frontend.js
144 ms
init.js
47 ms
gtm.js
50 ms
Sands.Outdoor.Services.Logo_.Albuquerque.png
43 ms
Albuquerque.landscaping.company.jpg
46 ms
Grounds-Maintenance-01-150x150.jpg
41 ms
Grounds-Maintenance-02-150x150.jpg
41 ms
Grounds-Maintenance-04-150x150.jpg
41 ms
Grounds-Maintenance-05-150x150.jpg
41 ms
Grounds-Maintenance-06-150x150.jpg
42 ms
IMG_0540-150x150.jpg
43 ms
IMG_0495-150x150.jpg
42 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff
124 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff
134 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff
143 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff
143 ms
font
144 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1g.woff
142 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
105 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
150 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
246 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
263 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
105 ms
goodfortesting.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
goodfortesting.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
goodfortesting.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodfortesting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Goodfortesting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
goodfortesting.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Goodfortesting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: