Tools & Wizards About Us
goodhairbadhairtest.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

goodhairbadhairtest.com

GOOD HAIR BAD HAIR test | What's your score?

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

408 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

205 ms

goodhairbadhairtest.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to goodhairbadhairtest.com homepage info - get ready to check GOOD HAIR BAD Test best content right away, or after learning these important things about goodhairbadhairtest.com

                                 

Visit goodhairbadhairtest.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Goodhairbadhairtest.com page load time and found that the first response time was 408 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

goodhairbadhairtest.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.goodhairbadhairtest.com

408 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

80 ms

ie.css

136 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

127 ms

fancySelect.css

114 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Goodhairbadhairtest.com, 16% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (408 ms) belongs to the original domain Goodhairbadhairtest.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 312.8 kB (70%)

Content Size

447.8 kB

After Optimization

135.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Goodhairbadhairtest.com main page is 447.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 210.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 31.1 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 945 B

  • Original 33.8 kB
  • After minification 32.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GOOD HAIR BAD Test images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 143.2 kB

  • Original 210.7 kB
  • After minification 201.1 kB
  • After compression 67.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 143.6 kB

  • Original 172.3 kB
  • After minification 152.4 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodhairbadhairtest.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (80%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GOOD HAIR BAD Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.goodhairbadhairtest.com

www.goodhairbadhairtest.com

408 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

80 ms

ie.css

ie.css

136 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

127 ms

fancySelect.css

fancySelect.css

114 ms

css

css

25 ms

style.css

style.css

200 ms

easy-responsive-tabs.css

easy-responsive-tabs.css

175 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

137 ms

ffs_styles.css

ffs_styles.css

179 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

214 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

227 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

206 ms

fancySelect.js

fancySelect.js

254 ms

mobile-dropdown.min.js

mobile-dropdown.min.js

240 ms

init.min.js

init.min.js

273 ms

small-menu-select.js

small-menu-select.js

256 ms

style.css

style.css

305 ms

easyResponsiveTabs.js

easyResponsiveTabs.js

267 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

334 ms

script.js

script.js

322 ms

count.js

count.js

333 ms

goodbadTEST3.png

goodbadTEST3.png

91 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

91 ms

thetest.png

thetest.png

91 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

8 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

10 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

18 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

18 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

19 ms

count.js

count.js

49 ms

SEO Factors

goodhairbadhairtest.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodhairbadhairtest.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Goodhairbadhairtest.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

goodhairbadhairtest.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GOOD HAIR BAD Test. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: