3.7 sec in total
761 ms
2.5 sec
407 ms
Welcome to googlesharing.net homepage info - get ready to check Googlesharing best content right away, or after learning these important things about googlesharing.net
Visit googlesharing.netWe analyzed Googlesharing.net page load time and found that the first response time was 761 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
googlesharing.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
1/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
46/100
10%
761 ms
103 ms
256 ms
242 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Googlesharing.net, 15% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (761 ms) belongs to the original domain Googlesharing.net.
Page size can be reduced by 257.2 kB (58%)
445.5 kB
188.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Googlesharing.net main page is 445.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 208.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Googlesharing needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 148.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Googlesharing.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (75%)
20
5
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Googlesharing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.googlesharing.net
761 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
103 ms
style.css
256 ms
font-awesome.min.css
242 ms
css
33 ms
css
46 ms
flexslider.css
221 ms
style.css
183 ms
jquery.js
273 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
260 ms
navigation.js
271 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
385 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
386 ms
core.min.js
404 ms
widget.min.js
394 ms
tabs.min.js
394 ms
custom.js
396 ms
wp-embed.min.js
412 ms
mein-Rechner-300x200.jpg
334 ms
dollar-300x189.png
435 ms
list.png
332 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
278 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
277 ms
evC1haE-MsorTl_A7_uSGaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
276 ms
2hig-tnMw8lXZsjwuh-9ow.ttf
277 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
295 ms
googlesharing.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
googlesharing.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
googlesharing.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Googlesharing.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Googlesharing.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
googlesharing.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Googlesharing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: