4 sec in total
84 ms
3.8 sec
62 ms
Welcome to gpim.net homepage info - get ready to check Gpim best content right away, or after learning these important things about gpim.net
Growth Properties is a hotel management firm with clients across the United States. We specialize in managing hotels. Contact us!
Visit gpim.netWe analyzed Gpim.net page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
gpim.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value5.7 s
52/100
10%
Value7,220 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value23.4 s
1/100
10%
84 ms
31 ms
65 ms
29 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gpim.net, 28% (16 requests) were made to Cdn.userway.org and 22% (13 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 398.9 kB (47%)
852.6 kB
453.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Gpim.net main page is 852.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 503.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 393.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 393.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gpim images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 104 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gpim.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (36%)
36
23
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gpim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gpim.net
84 ms
minified.js
31 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
65 ms
polyfill.min.js
29 ms
thunderbolt-commons.e7839053.bundle.min.js
103 ms
main.760485a2.bundle.min.js
116 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
102 ms
lodash.min.js
115 ms
react.production.min.js
103 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
117 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
114 ms
widget.js
195 ms
e97758_9f7a3a17cf9943839c68cc3d1db21537~mv2.jpg
283 ms
bundle.min.js
43 ms
e97758_7e86278535104ab4a3b214715de0257d~mv2.jpg
229 ms
e97758_b5f9424b6de143d89e37d2059817a005~mv2.jpg
191 ms
035244_84bf70a186044233b6d73970eb010512~mv2.png
115 ms
035244_6baafa34ad22400fb8be751380550043~mv2.png
142 ms
035244_bf267eff84f848c29f2231fa52e63885~mv2.png
35 ms
035244_0e50331439b1443d89559c1a252e012b~mv2.png
36 ms
growth.jpg
248 ms
Hotel-front-desk-.jpg
357 ms
handshake.jpg
348 ms
CY.jpg
378 ms
FFS.jpg
414 ms
d75ebfd677e34b528f18646cef0a0872.jpg
3512 ms
111 ms
108 ms
107 ms
106 ms
101 ms
103 ms
150 ms
139 ms
147 ms
146 ms
142 ms
104 ms
widget_app_base_1729845524407.js
21 ms
gPZtX4u4Jf
363 ms
en-US.json
8 ms
remediation-tool-free.js
8 ms
widget_base.css
13 ms
metropolis.css
7 ms
spin_wh.svg
48 ms
Metropolis-SemiBold.otf
8 ms
Metropolis-Bold.otf
18 ms
Metropolis-ExtraBold.otf
35 ms
Metropolis-Black.otf
36 ms
Metropolis-Medium.otf
35 ms
Metropolis-Regular.otf
34 ms
Metropolis-Light.otf
25 ms
Metropolis-ExtraLight.otf
35 ms
Metropolis-Thin.otf
45 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
29 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
11 ms
right-arrow.svg
11 ms
gpim.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
gpim.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gpim.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gpim.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gpim.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gpim.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gpim. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: