2.8 sec in total
273 ms
2.3 sec
221 ms
Click here to check amazing Gpmaintenance content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gpmaintenance.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit gpmaintenance.comWe analyzed Gpmaintenance.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
gpmaintenance.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.9 s
0/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value3,480 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.192
64/100
15%
Value19.9 s
2/100
10%
273 ms
222 ms
66 ms
54 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Gpmaintenance.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (282 ms) relates to the external source Linkedin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 676.1 kB (67%)
1.0 MB
338.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Gpmaintenance.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 777.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gpmaintenance needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 506.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 506.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gpmaintenance.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (75%)
103
26
The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gpmaintenance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gpmaintenance.com
273 ms
monetate.js
222 ms
application.css
66 ms
ng-modal.css
54 ms
angular.min.js
71 ms
ng-modal.js
53 ms
google_analytics.js
54 ms
google_oauth.js
53 ms
bold_chat.js
60 ms
eloqua.js
61 ms
hotjar.js
60 ms
adroll.js
60 ms
impactRadius.js
62 ms
in.js
64 ms
api.js
85 ms
api:client.js
91 ms
app.js
62 ms
cookies.js
62 ms
socialMedia.js
63 ms
countryDropdown.js
64 ms
monetate.js
64 ms
index.js
64 ms
lander.js
65 ms
seoPages.js
65 ms
sitePages.js
67 ms
search.js
67 ms
modal.js
68 ms
forms.js
74 ms
tldSelector.js
67 ms
setFixedTop.js
68 ms
searchBar.js
72 ms
currency.js
71 ms
trust.js
73 ms
conversion.js
49 ms
tdfs-inner.css
73 ms
tdfs-temp.css
75 ms
thankyou.css
74 ms
entry.js
55 ms
css
25 ms
fontawesome.min.css
10 ms
bd-icons.min.css
9 ms
ga.js
101 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
101 ms
userspace
282 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
98 ms
recaptcha__fr.js
209 ms
all.js
209 ms
272 ms
logo-header-2x.png
88 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
152 ms
272 ms
hotjar-10205.js
256 ms
elqCfg.min.js
116 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
101 ms
bg-select.png
101 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
101 ms
__utm.gif
65 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
43 ms
postmessageRelay
101 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
__utm.gif
73 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
28 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
73 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
74 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
73 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
72 ms
svrGP
134 ms
collect
121 ms
iframe
96 ms
fallback
63 ms
157 ms
65 ms
xd_arbiter.php
97 ms
xd_arbiter.php
180 ms
framework
37 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
92 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
59 ms
svrGP.aspx
52 ms
fallback__ltr.css
38 ms
payload
46 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
67 ms
css
89 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
65 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
11 ms
iframerpc
37 ms
logo_48.png
9 ms
refresh.png
7 ms
audio.png
7 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
25 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
29 ms
vms.js
89 ms
roundtrip.js
15 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
66 ms
xd_arbiter.php
48 ms
bc.pv
106 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
47 ms
out
14 ms
44 ms
13 ms
25 ms
out
17 ms
out
17 ms
out
19 ms
out
19 ms
out
21 ms
out
21 ms
out
23 ms
out
25 ms
30 ms
u.php
79 ms
adsct
119 ms
pixel
69 ms
42 ms
36 ms
sd
32 ms
377928.gif
31 ms
bounce
34 ms
u.php
80 ms
u.php
91 ms
u.php
132 ms
u.php
91 ms
u.php
93 ms
in
5 ms
Pug
30 ms
tap.php
47 ms
gpmaintenance.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
gpmaintenance.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gpmaintenance.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gpmaintenance.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gpmaintenance.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gpmaintenance.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gpmaintenance. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: