Tools & Wizards About Us
gracelaserskincare.ca screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

gracelaserskincare.ca

Grace Laser & Wellness - New Westminster - Home

Page Load Speed

851 ms in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

407 ms

Page Rendered

393 ms

gracelaserskincare.ca screenshot

About Website

Visit gracelaserskincare.ca now to see the best up-to-date Grace Laser Skincare content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gracelaserskincare.ca

Your primary source for laser hair removal, laser skin treatments, HydraFacials, LED teeth whitening and acupuncture

Visit gracelaserskincare.ca

Key Findings

We analyzed Gracelaserskincare.ca page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 800 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gracelaserskincare.ca performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gracelaserskincare.ca

51 ms

custom-frontend.min.css

19 ms

swiper.min.css

33 ms

e-swiper.min.css

37 ms

post-7.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Gracelaserskincare.ca, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (150 ms) belongs to the original domain Gracelaserskincare.ca.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 190.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gracelaserskincare.ca main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 89.1 kB

  • Original 107.4 kB
  • After minification 102.9 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Grace Laser Skincare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 98.4 kB

  • Original 255.6 kB
  • After minification 255.6 kB
  • After compression 157.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.4 kB or 38% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 49.6 kB
  • After minification 47.4 kB
  • After compression 46.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gracelaserskincare.ca has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (80%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grace Laser Skincare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gracelaserskincare.ca

gracelaserskincare.ca

51 ms

custom-frontend.min.css

custom-frontend.min.css

19 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

33 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

37 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

27 ms

post-7535.css

post-7535.css

28 ms

bootstrap-light.min.css

bootstrap-light.min.css

25 ms

base.min.css

base.min.css

37 ms

widget-recent-post-comments.min.css

widget-recent-post-comments.min.css

42 ms

widget-wd-recent-posts.min.css

widget-wd-recent-posts.min.css

44 ms

widget-nav.min.css

widget-nav.min.css

43 ms

woo-widget-wd-layered-nav.min.css

woo-widget-wd-layered-nav.min.css

50 ms

woo-mod-swatches-base.min.css

woo-mod-swatches-base.min.css

55 ms

woo-mod-swatches-filter.min.css

woo-mod-swatches-filter.min.css

55 ms

woo-widget-layered-nav-stock-status.min.css

woo-widget-layered-nav-stock-status.min.css

58 ms

woo-widget-product-list.min.css

woo-widget-product-list.min.css

58 ms

woo-widget-slider-price-filter.min.css

woo-widget-slider-price-filter.min.css

59 ms

wp-gutenberg.min.css

wp-gutenberg.min.css

85 ms

int-wpcf7.min.css

int-wpcf7.min.css

69 ms

int-elem-base.min.css

int-elem-base.min.css

69 ms

style.css

style.css

71 ms

header-base.min.css

header-base.min.css

76 ms

mod-tools.min.css

mod-tools.min.css

75 ms

header-el-base.min.css

header-el-base.min.css

87 ms

header-el-mobile-nav-dropdown.min.css

header-el-mobile-nav-dropdown.min.css

83 ms

mod-animations-keyframes.min.css

mod-animations-keyframes.min.css

85 ms

el-section-title.min.css

el-section-title.min.css

91 ms

lib-swiper.min.css

lib-swiper.min.css

97 ms

el-info-box.min.css

el-info-box.min.css

103 ms

lib-swiper-arrows.min.css

lib-swiper-arrows.min.css

105 ms

el-menu-price.min.css

el-menu-price.min.css

97 ms

mod-star-rating.min.css

mod-star-rating.min.css

112 ms

el-testimonial-old.min.css

el-testimonial-old.min.css

111 ms

lib-swiper-pagin.min.css

lib-swiper-pagin.min.css

123 ms

opt-widget-collapse.min.css

opt-widget-collapse.min.css

118 ms

footer-base.min.css

footer-base.min.css

121 ms

css

css

39 ms

css

css

53 ms

el-list.min.css

el-list.min.css

117 ms

opt-scrolltotop.min.css

opt-scrolltotop.min.css

113 ms

post-7566.css

post-7566.css

107 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

110 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

117 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

121 ms

device.min.js

device.min.js

104 ms

scrollBar.min.js

scrollBar.min.js

118 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

94 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

150 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

150 ms

index.js

index.js

148 ms

tti.min.js

tti.min.js

11 ms

index.js

index.js

145 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

144 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

144 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

144 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

146 ms

cookie.min.js

cookie.min.js

131 ms

helpers.min.js

helpers.min.js

138 ms

woocommerceNotices.min.js

woocommerceNotices.min.js

144 ms

headerBuilder.min.js

headerBuilder.min.js

132 ms

menuOffsets.min.js

menuOffsets.min.js

133 ms

menuSetUp.min.js

menuSetUp.min.js

126 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

125 ms

swiperInit.min.js

swiperInit.min.js

126 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

125 ms

widgetCollapse.min.js

widgetCollapse.min.js

121 ms

scrollTop.min.js

scrollTop.min.js

121 ms

mobileNavigation.min.js

mobileNavigation.min.js

120 ms

logo-dark-1.png

logo-dark-1.png

30 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

91 ms

expert.png

expert.png

54 ms

award.png

award.png

55 ms

speacials.png

speacials.png

93 ms

about-image.png

about-image.png

56 ms

award-2017.png

award-2017.png

89 ms

award-2018.png

award-2018.png

57 ms

award-2019.png

award-2019.png

57 ms

award-2020.png

award-2020.png

91 ms

offerss-e1726946892714-265x350.png

offerss-e1726946892714-265x350.png

93 ms

WhatsApp-Image-2024-09-23-at-02.17.02-1-150x150.png

WhatsApp-Image-2024-09-23-at-02.17.02-1-150x150.png

92 ms

WhatsApp-Image-2024-09-23-at-02.17.03-150x150.png

WhatsApp-Image-2024-09-23-at-02.17.03-150x150.png

96 ms

WhatsApp-Image-2024-09-23-at-02.17.02-1-1-150x150.png

WhatsApp-Image-2024-09-23-at-02.17.02-1-1-150x150.png

94 ms

logo-light-153x60.png

logo-light-153x60.png

92 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

26 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXbMZhKg.ttf

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXbMZhKg.ttf

21 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMZhKg.ttf

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMZhKg.ttf

31 ms

Accessibility Review

gracelaserskincare.ca accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gracelaserskincare.ca best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

gracelaserskincare.ca SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gracelaserskincare.ca can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gracelaserskincare.ca main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gracelaserskincare.ca

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Grace Laser Skincare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: