3.4 sec in total
231 ms
2.6 sec
599 ms
Click here to check amazing Grade Geeks content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gradegeeks.com
An optimistic and extraordinary name built for success. Perfect for business ideas like a professional service, a mobile app, an affiliate site, a web portal and more.
Visit gradegeeks.comWe analyzed Gradegeeks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 231 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
gradegeeks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value4.0 s
49/100
25%
Value6.6 s
37/100
10%
Value1,980 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value20.3 s
2/100
10%
231 ms
153 ms
136 ms
139 ms
165 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Gradegeeks.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Gradegeeks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (46%)
3.9 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Gradegeeks.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 105.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 157.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Grade Geeks images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 833.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 833.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 698.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gradegeeks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 698.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (82%)
71
13
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grade Geeks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gradegeeks.com
231 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
153 ms
styles.css
136 ms
fontsforwebstyle.css
139 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.14.custom.css
165 ms
colorpicker.css
143 ms
go_pricing_styles.css
145 ms
font-awesome.min.css
208 ms
settings.css
198 ms
css
25 ms
css
39 ms
ace-video-container.css
215 ms
select2Buttons.css
219 ms
css
48 ms
masterslider.main.css
234 ms
custom.css
234 ms
gradegeeks.com
260 ms
bootstrap.min.css
323 ms
ss-gizmo.css
292 ms
font-awesome.min.css
296 ms
style.css
430 ms
responsive.css
310 ms
gradegeeks.com
337 ms
jquery.js
456 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
370 ms
jquery.fcarousel.min.js
386 ms
core.min.js
382 ms
widget.min.js
391 ms
mouse.min.js
470 ms
draggable.min.js
470 ms
slider.min.js
472 ms
colorpicker.js
473 ms
sortable.min.js
505 ms
jquery.fontPlugin.js
565 ms
pluginscripts.js
520 ms
front.js
512 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
592 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
523 ms
jQuery.select2Buttons.js
577 ms
js
27 ms
menu.js
537 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
488 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
487 ms
jquery.simplr.smoothscroll.js
508 ms
wpmss.php
499 ms
jquery.form.min.js
554 ms
scripts.js
541 ms
love-it.js
504 ms
jquery.cookie.js
497 ms
bootstrap.min.js
514 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.2.custom.min.js
535 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
518 ms
jquery.easing.js
518 ms
jquery.carouFredSel.min.js
495 ms
theme-scripts.js
587 ms
view.min.js
484 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
493 ms
imagesloaded.js
477 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
482 ms
functions.js
598 ms
wp-embed.min.js
461 ms
gge3-1.png
477 ms
I1-min.jpg
619 ms
Optimized-2.jpg
648 ms
HOWITWORKS.png
445 ms
AL0V4Q84GP.jpg
449 ms
crease.svg
444 ms
l1blur3.jpg
1281 ms
sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff
447 ms
ss-gizmo.woff
447 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGBPPOa1q11iOmmM9mDHHHX4.ttf
21 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
21 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGKXvKVW_haheDNrHjziJZVk.ttf
22 ms
SourceSansProRegular.woff
439 ms
sourcesanspro-bold-webfont.woff
557 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
558 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
586 ms
78UgGRwJFkhqaoFimqoKpQ.ttf
21 ms
SourceSansProBold.woff
613 ms
slider-nav.png
178 ms
widget_v2.134.js
28 ms
showcase-nav.png
367 ms
Museo500-Regular-webfont.woff
365 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
63 ms
gradegeeks.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
gradegeeks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
gradegeeks.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gradegeeks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gradegeeks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gradegeeks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Grade Geeks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: