6.5 sec in total
724 ms
5.2 sec
511 ms
Click here to check amazing Grafista content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about grafista.ru
Команда веб-разработчиков. Занимаемся дизайном, программированием и продвижением интернет-проектов. Находимся в Череповце, работаем по всему миру.
Visit grafista.ruWe analyzed Grafista.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 724 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
grafista.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value20.2 s
0/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value1,270 ms
19/100
30%
Value1.05
2/100
15%
Value17.3 s
4/100
10%
724 ms
62 ms
139 ms
38 ms
581 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Grafista.ru, 15% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Grafista.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 306.1 kB (15%)
2.0 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Grafista.ru main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 208.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 208.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Grafista images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 40.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grafista.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (57%)
63
27
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grafista. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
grafista.ru
724 ms
js
62 ms
f9a7b.css
139 ms
css
38 ms
f9a7b.css
581 ms
f9a7b.css
423 ms
f9a7b.css
569 ms
css
58 ms
f9a7b.css
714 ms
css
58 ms
jquery.js
578 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
435 ms
taptap-accordion.js
562 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
754 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
702 ms
script.js
704 ms
scripts.js
708 ms
taptap.js
750 ms
taptap-smart-scroll.js
908 ms
custom-graf.js
908 ms
modernizr.js
909 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
909 ms
isotope.min.js
908 ms
superfish.js
908 ms
init.js
1501 ms
infinitescroll.js
1222 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1223 ms
flickity.min.js
1222 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1222 ms
stickkit.js
1221 ms
touchswipe.min.js
1358 ms
select2.min.js
1365 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1356 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1361 ms
grafista.ru
958 ms
gralogo.png
670 ms
gralogowhite.png
672 ms
f2-500x500.jpg
960 ms
lon2-500x500.jpg
958 ms
turnable-500x500.jpg
958 ms
vine-500x500.jpg
959 ms
mans.jpg
967 ms
piggy_pink_s.jpg
1119 ms
backsbt-1-1000x500.jpg
960 ms
krispyk-500x500.jpg
1074 ms
framechsu-500x500.jpg
965 ms
550909e16968ccd21b44b8fb69966cb7-1000x1000.jpg
1112 ms
05349894ca056578f8afb0d2e5477a87-500x500.jpg
974 ms
skoda-500x500.jpg
1112 ms
%D0%BA%D1%81%D1%8E-500x500.jpg
1118 ms
alta.jpg
1123 ms
mirteplic-500x500.jpg
1210 ms
ekska-500x500.jpg
1372 ms
hockaaa-500x500.jpg
1170 ms
telega.svg
1171 ms
whatsapp.svg
1174 ms
mail.svg
1176 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
312 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
1527 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
336 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
1525 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
334 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
1525 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
336 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw9aX8.ttf
335 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
336 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw9aX8.ttf
335 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw9aX8.ttf
379 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w9aX8.ttf
380 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w9aX8.ttf
380 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
379 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w9aX8.ttf
378 ms
chatra.js
378 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1213 ms
tag.js
978 ms
chat.chatra.io
68 ms
ajax-loader.gif
667 ms
0f4b36301fb51872f1b179a76dbf2e28b4b4a818.css
40 ms
meteor_runtime_config.js
18 ms
da64b544ef77c8a36b93ed650846594943696be1.js
120 ms
grafista.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
grafista.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
grafista.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grafista.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Grafista.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
grafista.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Grafista. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: