Tools & Wizards About Us
graphic-review.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

graphic-review.com

Graphic Review supporting meaningful learning and efficient teaching and training.

Page Load Speed

602 ms in total

First Response

113 ms

Resources Loaded

214 ms

Page Rendered

275 ms

graphic-review.com screenshot

About Website

Visit graphic-review.com now to see the best up-to-date Graphic Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about graphic-review.com

Graphic Review is a contribution to Meaningful Learning and Efficient Teaching through learner centred teaching activities: critical review and co-operative learning.

Visit graphic-review.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Graphic-review.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 489 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

graphic-review.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,320 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

graphic-review.com

113 ms

show_ads.js

3 ms

ca-pub-4341881480482751.js

107 ms

zrt_lookup.html

27 ms

show_ads_impl.js

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Graphic-review.com, 57% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 29% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (113 ms) belongs to the original domain Graphic-review.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 191.5 kB (61%)

Content Size

311.5 kB

After Optimization

120.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Graphic-review.com main page is 311.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 285.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 20.2 kB

  • Original 26.3 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 171.4 kB

  • Original 285.2 kB
  • After minification 285.2 kB
  • After compression 113.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 171.4 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (50%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

3

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graphic Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

graphic-review.com

graphic-review.com

113 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

3 ms

ca-pub-4341881480482751.js

ca-pub-4341881480482751.js

107 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

27 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

29 ms

ads

ads

27 ms

osd.js

osd.js

4 ms

Accessibility Review

graphic-review.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

graphic-review.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

graphic-review.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graphic-review.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Graphic-review.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

graphic-review.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Graphic Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: