Tools & Wizards About Us
graphicconsortium.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

graphicconsortium.in

Graphic Consortium

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

23 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

graphicconsortium.in screenshot

About Website

Visit graphicconsortium.in now to see the best up-to-date Graphic Consortium content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about graphicconsortium.in

Graphic Consortium is one of the Best website designing Company and an E-commerce or Shopping cart Development Company in Vyttila, Cochin, Kerala, South India. This page describe about company details...

Visit graphicconsortium.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Graphicconsortium.in page load time and found that the first response time was 23 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

graphicconsortium.in performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

graphicconsortium.in

23 ms

graphicconsortium.in

355 ms

bootstrap.min.css

12 ms

font-awesome.min.css

24 ms

animate.min.css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Graphicconsortium.in, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (916 ms) belongs to the original domain Graphicconsortium.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.8 kB (2%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Graphicconsortium.in main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 40.1 kB
  • After minification 40.0 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 22.9 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graphic Consortium images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (36%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graphic Consortium. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

graphicconsortium.in

graphicconsortium.in

23 ms

graphicconsortium.in

graphicconsortium.in

355 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

12 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

24 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

26 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

28 ms

main.css

main.css

18 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

25 ms

main_ad.css

main_ad.css

24 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

22 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

33 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

32 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

32 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

33 ms

main.js

main.js

33 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

38 ms

logo.png

logo.png

41 ms

img1.png

img1.png

147 ms

img2.png

img2.png

148 ms

img3.png

img3.png

151 ms

img4.png

img4.png

147 ms

Website-Designing-Development.jpg

Website-Designing-Development.jpg

151 ms

Dynamic-Websites-CMS-Devepment.jpg

Dynamic-Websites-CMS-Devepment.jpg

152 ms

E-Commerce-Solutions.jpg

E-Commerce-Solutions.jpg

151 ms

item1.png

item1.png

916 ms

item2.png

item2.png

152 ms

item3.png

item3.png

153 ms

item4.png

item4.png

154 ms

item5.png

item5.png

154 ms

item6.png

item6.png

155 ms

item7.png

item7.png

157 ms

item8.png

item8.png

155 ms

css

css

27 ms

bg1.jpg

bg1.jpg

596 ms

bg2.jpg

bg2.jpg

15 ms

bg3.jpg

bg3.jpg

14 ms

bg4.jpg

bg4.jpg

13 ms

contact.png

contact.png

21 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff

18 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xo.woff

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xo.woff

21 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

608 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUZiYw.woff

24 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYw.woff

27 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff

30 ms

Accessibility Review

graphicconsortium.in accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

graphicconsortium.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

graphicconsortium.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graphicconsortium.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graphicconsortium.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

graphicconsortium.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Graphic Consortium. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: