Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

graphicmail.net

Simple, Affordable, Powerful Marketing Automation | SharpSpring

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

637 ms

graphicmail.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to graphicmail.net homepage info - get ready to check Graphicmail best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about graphicmail.net

SharpSpring marketing automation helps marketers drive more leads, convert more leads to sales, and optimize marketing ROI. Trusted by more than 2,000 agencies and 10,000 businesses, marketers around ...

Visit graphicmail.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Graphicmail.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

graphicmail.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

graphicmail.com

1089 ms

fbds.js

11 ms

css_lQaZfjVpwP_oGNqdtWCSpJT1EMqXdMiU84ekLLxQnc4.css

12 ms

css_V2GP6crt80I6NPwMa6WCmLEzFbh3WT8TtGC8SIOkNU4.css

37 ms

css_Ziq8HDuEmZeS5z930Vd4ynPiC02nodpI_ot2Qau80Yk.css

10 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Graphicmail.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Koi-uqthx6.sharpspring.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Koi-uqthx6.sharpspring.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (48%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Graphicmail.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 737.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 83.7 kB

  • Original 112.3 kB
  • After minification 112.0 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 737.9 kB
  • After minification 735.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graphicmail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 467.7 kB

  • Original 717.5 kB
  • After minification 697.1 kB
  • After compression 249.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 467.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 476.1 kB

  • Original 565.3 kB
  • After minification 563.5 kB
  • After compression 89.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graphicmail.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 476.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (40%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

51

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graphicmail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

graphicmail.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graphicmail.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graphicmail.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Graphicmail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: