4.1 sec in total
198 ms
3.4 sec
499 ms
Click here to check amazing Groffr content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about groffr.com
Visit groffr.comWe analyzed Groffr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 198 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
groffr.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value15.1 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value420 ms
66/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
198 ms
621 ms
322 ms
298 ms
300 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Groffr.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Groffr.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (46%)
2.9 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Groffr.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Groffr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 778.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 778.9 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 476.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Groffr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 476.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (76%)
85
20
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Groffr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
groffr.com
198 ms
www.groffr.com
621 ms
idex.css
322 ms
style.css
298 ms
datepicker.css
300 ms
client.css
298 ms
client1.css
358 ms
font.css
592 ms
simple-line.css
566 ms
jquery-ui.css
567 ms
fileinput.min.css
573 ms
bootstrap.css
605 ms
datepicker1.css
627 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
839 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
841 ms
style2.css
857 ms
idx.css
879 ms
styles.css
878 ms
style.css
1153 ms
jquery.min.js
20 ms
jquery.js
864 ms
jquery-migrate.js
864 ms
dsidxpress.js
888 ms
full.js
880 ms
handlers.js
872 ms
common.js
886 ms
css
34 ms
jquery.min.js
3 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
7 ms
g=commonjs
1073 ms
conversion.js
36 ms
map.js
645 ms
bootstrap-datepicker2.js
645 ms
property.js
651 ms
agent.js
654 ms
testimonials.js
656 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
673 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
662 ms
bootstrap.js
685 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1017 ms
jquery-ui-touch-punch.js
672 ms
jquery.slimscroll.min.js
685 ms
markerclusterer.js
702 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
679 ms
client-platform.js
677 ms
infobox.js
674 ms
fileinput.min.js
660 ms
image-scale.min.js
631 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
454 ms
services.js
427 ms
main.js
426 ms
ajax-upload.js
413 ms
plans-ajax-upload.js
396 ms
core.min.js
400 ms
widget.min.js
192 ms
position.min.js
191 ms
menu.min.js
187 ms
css
71 ms
page-loader.gif
622 ms
groffr-bg5.png
738 ms
groffr-new-logo.png
277 ms
facebook-icon.png
277 ms
gmail-icon.png
435 ms
location_icon.png
436 ms
agent_icon.png
544 ms
buy_rent_icon.png
554 ms
property_icon.png
564 ms
buyer-group.png
583 ms
3853thumbmogra%20vikas.jpg
1001 ms
3057thumbSpark%20Developers-Desai%20Oceanic.jpg
829 ms
7770thumbKolte%20Patil-Jai-Vijay-Mumbai.jpg
968 ms
2428thumbomkar-royal%20nest-noida(.jpg
869 ms
6523thumbSpark%20Developers-Desai-Harmony.png
885 ms
6926thumbMadhusudan.jpg
1015 ms
697logoconart.jpg
1116 ms
4811logosanjeevani.jpg
947 ms
6311logopushkar_enterprises_copy_copy.jpg
1157 ms
5548logoraj.jpg
1221 ms
groffr-mini.png
1238 ms
facebook_icon.png
1274 ms
twitter_icon.png
1298 ms
g_plus_icon.png
1393 ms
linked_in_icon.png
1433 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1499 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
30 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
36 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
main.js
136 ms
places.js
221 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
47 ms
ga-audiences
39 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
208 ms
8b0211
217 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.ttf
91 ms
groffr.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
groffr.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
groffr.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Groffr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Groffr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
groffr.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Groffr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: