1.5 sec in total
23 ms
761 ms
704 ms
Visit ground-track.com now to see the best up-to-date Ground Track content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ground-track.com
Groundwidgets - the leading company in innovative software development for the ground transportation industry
Visit ground-track.comWe analyzed Ground-track.com page load time and found that the first response time was 23 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
ground-track.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value6,310 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
23 ms
69 ms
102 ms
37 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ground-track.com, 94% (103 requests) were made to Groundwidgets.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (241 ms) relates to the external source Groundwidgets.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (38%)
7.8 MB
4.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Ground-track.com main page is 7.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ground Track needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.8 MB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 54.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 54.4 kB or 30% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ground-track.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 43% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (3%)
100
97
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ground Track. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ground-track.com
23 ms
www.groundwidgets.com
69 ms
www.groundwidgets.com
102 ms
main.css
37 ms
BotDetectCaptcha.ashx
59 ms
jquery.js
134 ms
core.js
204 ms
common.js
64 ms
site.js
59 ms
css
26 ms
spacer.gif
10 ms
logo.png
42 ms
drop.png
28 ms
city.jpg
181 ms
cars.jpg
40 ms
bridge.jpg
47 ms
man.jpg
180 ms
pattern.png
176 ms
corner.png
176 ms
1.png
177 ms
1.png
181 ms
1.png
178 ms
1.png
177 ms
1.png
181 ms
1.png
183 ms
GroundXchange.png
183 ms
gradient.png
184 ms
GroundMerchant.png
182 ms
GroundSpan.png
185 ms
GroundApp.png
186 ms
SantaCruz.png
187 ms
GroundPad.png
185 ms
GroundTech.png
188 ms
GroundTalk.png
192 ms
GroundTrack.png
189 ms
birdy.png
190 ms
back.png
191 ms
G_SantaCruz_1.jpg
193 ms
G_SantaCruz_2.jpg
195 ms
G_SantaCruz_3.jpg
195 ms
santacruz.png
193 ms
G_Track_1.jpg
200 ms
G_Track_2.jpg
204 ms
G_Track_3.jpg
241 ms
groundtrack.png
196 ms
G_Pad_1.jpg
192 ms
G_Span_1.jpg
225 ms
G_Span_2.jpg
160 ms
G_Span_3.jpg
223 ms
G_App_1.jpg
195 ms
proximanova-regular.woff
83 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0aEwA.ttf
127 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OqtKA.ttf
177 ms
jizYRExUiTo99u79D0e0w8mN.ttf
219 ms
jizdRExUiTo99u79D0e8fOydKxUY.ttf
196 ms
proximanova-light.woff
79 ms
G_App_2.jpg
80 ms
G_App_3.jpg
75 ms
G_Xchange.jpg
149 ms
G_Tech.jpg
105 ms
G_Merchant_1.png
150 ms
groundtalk.png
103 ms
1.jpg
102 ms
2.jpg
104 ms
3.jpg
106 ms
ChosenPayments.png
114 ms
FerrariMerchants.png
109 ms
Oag.png
112 ms
Zipwhip.png
119 ms
breaking-news.png
119 ms
article.png
131 ms
2.png
131 ms
3.png
130 ms
4.png
128 ms
5.png
140 ms
2.png
142 ms
3.png
137 ms
4.png
140 ms
5.png
144 ms
6.png
146 ms
2.png
149 ms
3.png
150 ms
4.png
149 ms
5.png
152 ms
2.png
148 ms
3.png
128 ms
4.png
124 ms
5.png
122 ms
6.png
114 ms
7.png
131 ms
8.png
131 ms
9.png
132 ms
10.png
126 ms
11.png
108 ms
12.png
105 ms
2.png
105 ms
3.png
106 ms
4.png
106 ms
5.png
117 ms
6.png
112 ms
7.png
110 ms
8.png
110 ms
9.png
103 ms
2.png
94 ms
3.png
90 ms
4.png
91 ms
5.png
92 ms
6.png
92 ms
7.png
86 ms
ground-track.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ground-track.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ground-track.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ground-track.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ground-track.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ground-track.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ground Track. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: