Tools & Wizards About Us
groupbayport.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

groupbayport.com

Group Bayport

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

398 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

790 ms

groupbayport.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to groupbayport.com homepage info - get ready to check Group Bayport best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about groupbayport.com

Visit groupbayport.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Groupbayport.com page load time and found that the first response time was 398 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

groupbayport.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value19.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value33.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,740 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value43.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

groupbayport.com

398 ms

groupbayport.com

1206 ms

styles.css

186 ms

graphina-charts-for-elementor-public.css

371 ms

graphina-charts-for-elementor-pro.css

553 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original Groupbayport.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Groupbayport.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (30%)

Content Size

8.5 MB

After Optimization

6.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Groupbayport.com main page is 8.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 113.6 kB

  • Original 140.4 kB
  • After minification 135.1 kB
  • After compression 26.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 436.5 kB

  • Original 5.8 MB
  • After minification 5.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Group Bayport images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 542.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 704.5 kB

  • Original 818.3 kB
  • After minification 808.3 kB
  • After compression 113.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Groupbayport.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 704.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (67%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Group Bayport. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

groupbayport.com

groupbayport.com

398 ms

groupbayport.com

groupbayport.com

1206 ms

styles.css

styles.css

186 ms

graphina-charts-for-elementor-public.css

graphina-charts-for-elementor-public.css

371 ms

graphina-charts-for-elementor-pro.css

graphina-charts-for-elementor-pro.css

553 ms

sr7.css

sr7.css

554 ms

header-style-4.min.css

header-style-4.min.css

555 ms

card-box-style-1.min.css

card-box-style-1.min.css

558 ms

icon-heading-style-8.min.css

icon-heading-style-8.min.css

562 ms

icon-heading-style-3.min.css

icon-heading-style-3.min.css

564 ms

blog-style-1.min.css

blog-style-1.min.css

735 ms

team-style-3.min.css

team-style-3.min.css

735 ms

groupbayport.com

groupbayport.com

833 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

929 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1498 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

938 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

919 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1658 ms

elementor.min.css

elementor.min.css

1017 ms

core.min.css

core.min.css

1654 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

1488 ms

widget.min.css

widget.min.css

1125 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

1201 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

1314 ms

pbminfotech-base-icons.css

pbminfotech-base-icons.css

1386 ms

balloon.min.css

balloon.min.css

1502 ms

theme-style.min.css

theme-style.min.css

1574 ms

global-color.min.css

global-color.min.css

1674 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

1683 ms

post-95.css

post-95.css

1690 ms

css

css

34 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1945 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1836 ms

apexcharts.min.js

apexcharts.min.js

2389 ms

graphina-charts-for-elementor-public.js

graphina-charts-for-elementor-public.js

1860 ms

tptools.js

tptools.js

2058 ms

sr7.js

sr7.js

2442 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

2021 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

47 ms

css2

css2

30 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

2044 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

16 ms

lottie-player.js

lottie-player.js

37 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1951 ms

elementor.min.js

elementor.min.js

1842 ms

gsap.min.js

gsap.min.js

1686 ms

ScrollTrigger.js

ScrollTrigger.js

1699 ms

SplitText.min.js

SplitText.min.js

1765 ms

cursor.min.js

cursor.min.js

1873 ms

magnetic.min.js

magnetic.min.js

1869 ms

gsap-animation.min.js

gsap-animation.min.js

1876 ms

animated-counter.min.js

animated-counter.min.js

1770 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1872 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1775 ms

index.js

index.js

1710 ms

index.js

index.js

1701 ms

new-tab.js

new-tab.js

1697 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

1678 ms

numinate.min.js

numinate.min.js

1633 ms

circle-progress.min.js

circle-progress.min.js

1559 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1667 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1425 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1336 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1376 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1441 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1370 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

296 ms

logo-1-1.png

logo-1-1.png

537 ms

BannerBuzz-1-1.png

BannerBuzz-1-1.png

186 ms

image-2.jpg

image-2.jpg

369 ms

Best-Of-Signs-1-1.png

Best-Of-Signs-1-1.png

369 ms

bestofsigns.png

bestofsigns.png

371 ms

CoversAll-1-1.png

CoversAll-1-1.png

374 ms

CoversAll-.jpg

CoversAll-.jpg

376 ms

Neon-Earth-1-1.png

Neon-Earth-1-1.png

382 ms

Neon-Earth-.jpg

Neon-Earth-.jpg

553 ms

our-team.jpg

our-team.jpg

695 ms

6d13810c57952b41d9ee689070670896-950x480.webp

6d13810c57952b41d9ee689070670896-950x480.webp

546 ms

Newsroom.jpg

Newsroom.jpg

617 ms

Newsroom-1.jpg

Newsroom-1.jpg

799 ms

Newsroom-2.jpg

Newsroom-2.jpg

653 ms

Newsroom-3.png

Newsroom-3.png

863 ms

thumbnail_PROFILE-PHOTO_CROPPED-950x700.jpg

thumbnail_PROFILE-PHOTO_CROPPED-950x700.jpg

732 ms

Photo-1.jpg

Photo-1.jpg

801 ms

tom.jpg

tom.jpg

839 ms

Tarang-Gosalia-CEO-optamark-2.jpg

Tarang-Gosalia-CEO-optamark-2.jpg

883 ms

Nishant-sir.jpg

Nishant-sir.jpg

920 ms

rajiv-bhatt-1.jpg

rajiv-bhatt-1.jpg

982 ms

Sukanta-Pal.jpg

Sukanta-Pal.jpg

949 ms

pbminfotech-base-icons.woff

pbminfotech-base-icons.woff

940 ms

Jitender-Sharma-1.jpg

Jitender-Sharma-1.jpg

963 ms

Prashant-Hole.jpg

Prashant-Hole.jpg

960 ms

SZcS3EX9IbbyeJ8aOluD52KXgUA_7Ed1I13G853Cp9duUYG_ZVtk.ttf

SZcS3EX9IbbyeJ8aOluD52KXgUA_7Ed1I13G853Cp9duUYG_ZVtk.ttf

45 ms

SZcS3EX9IbbyeJ8aOluD52KXgUA_7Ed1I13G853Cp9duUYFTYltk.ttf

SZcS3EX9IbbyeJ8aOluD52KXgUA_7Ed1I13G853Cp9duUYFTYltk.ttf

100 ms

logo-2.png

logo-2.png

994 ms

ajax-loader.svg

ajax-loader.svg

1051 ms

BannerBuzz-1-1.png

BannerBuzz-1-1.png

987 ms

image-2.jpg

image-2.jpg

1227 ms

Best-Of-Signs-1-1.png

Best-Of-Signs-1-1.png

870 ms

bestofsigns.png

bestofsigns.png

897 ms

CoversAll-1-1.png

CoversAll-1-1.png

919 ms

CoversAll-.jpg

CoversAll-.jpg

1169 ms

Neon-Earth-1-1.png

Neon-Earth-1-1.png

974 ms

Neon-Earth-.jpg

Neon-Earth-.jpg

877 ms

Accessibility Review

groupbayport.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

groupbayport.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

groupbayport.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Groupbayport.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Groupbayport.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

groupbayport.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Group Bayport. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: