Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

gtjg.net

体育直播吧-JRs直播-体育低调看直播-飞速看足球直播-NBA直播吧

Page Load Speed

33.1 sec in total

First Response

2.7 sec

Resources Loaded

30.1 sec

Page Rendered

314 ms

gtjg.net screenshot

About Website

Visit gtjg.net now to see the best up-to-date Gtjg content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gtjg.net

体育直播吧高清免费无插件,2021欧洲杯直播赛程表,2022世界杯时间,世界杯分组,2022世界杯直播cctv5,世界杯积分榜、射手榜及JRS在线在足球世界杯直播,欧洲杯直播,欧冠,英超,西甲,意甲,德甲,中超,亚冠等视频直播。

Visit gtjg.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Gtjg.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 30.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 22 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

gtjg.net performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gtjg.net

2722 ms

style.css

1698 ms

index.css

2934 ms

lang.js

3439 ms

config.js

1612 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gtjg.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Gtjg.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 123.7 kB (71%)

Content Size

174.1 kB

After Optimization

50.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Gtjg.net main page is 174.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 111.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 31.8 kB

  • Original 39.5 kB
  • After minification 39.5 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 155 B
  • After minification 154 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gtjg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 74.3 kB

  • Original 111.9 kB
  • After minification 106.7 kB
  • After compression 37.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

  • Original 22.5 kB
  • After minification 20.3 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gtjg.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (31%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gtjg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gtjg.net accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

gtjg.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gtjg.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GBK

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gtjg.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gtjg.net main page’s claimed encoding is gbk. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gtjg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: