2.5 sec in total
101 ms
1.4 sec
984 ms
Visit gtpackaging.com now to see the best up-to-date Gtpackaging content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gtpackaging.com
75+ Years In Business 11 Public Showrooms 7 Distribution Centers 4,800+ SKUs In Stock Custodial Supplies From custodial supplies and cleaning equipment, to hand hygiene programs and custodial staff tr...
Visit gtpackaging.comWe analyzed Gtpackaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
gtpackaging.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value1,270 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
101 ms
184 ms
217 ms
116 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gtpackaging.com, 83% (55 requests) were made to Kssenterprises.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (584 ms) relates to the external source Kssenterprises.com.
Page size can be reduced by 347.8 kB (18%)
1.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Gtpackaging.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 240.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 240.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gtpackaging images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 43.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.4 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gtpackaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (80%)
56
11
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gtpackaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gtpackaging.com
101 ms
kssenterprises.com
184 ms
kssenterprises.com
217 ms
dtnu2.css
116 ms
dtnu2.css
172 ms
post-8.css
152 ms
dtnu2.css
221 ms
post-5.css
156 ms
dtnu2.css
200 ms
css
32 ms
dtnu2.css
182 ms
post-9661.css
197 ms
post-9712.css
217 ms
css
44 ms
dtnu2.css
235 ms
css
47 ms
dtnu2.css
256 ms
dtnu2.js
281 ms
dtnu2.js
238 ms
js
68 ms
dtnu2.css
210 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
235 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
236 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
376 ms
hooks.min.js
375 ms
i18n.min.js
377 ms
theme.js
379 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
377 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
378 ms
theme.min.js
377 ms
drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js
378 ms
drop-down-search.min.js
379 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
380 ms
ow-lightbox.min.js
380 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
381 ms
ow-slider.min.js
379 ms
scroll-effect.min.js
380 ms
select.min.js
381 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
415 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
417 ms
waypoints.min.js
416 ms
core.min.js
417 ms
frontend.min.js
418 ms
sticky-element.js
336 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
410 ms
post-pagination.js
406 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
421 ms
frontend.min.js
426 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
410 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
393 ms
blob_green.png
282 ms
kssmailsig.png
282 ms
BUCK9006-0160.jpg
407 ms
CLOROX30824.jpg
369 ms
CRN16-CH.jpg
408 ms
DIAL82838.jpg
368 ms
KSSKSSFILGL.jpg
368 ms
bb-logo-west-michigan-1024x351.png
584 ms
bb-logo-west-michigan.png
389 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
181 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
182 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
218 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
243 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
244 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
244 ms
jkiticon.woff
431 ms
gtpackaging.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
gtpackaging.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gtpackaging.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gtpackaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gtpackaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gtpackaging.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gtpackaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: