3.9 sec in total
244 ms
3.1 sec
564 ms
Visit guarddog.ai now to see the best up-to-date GuardDog content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about guarddog.ai
guardDog for home & business is the only cybersecurity service that uses AI to automatically detect cyber threats, protecting your network, devices, and Wi-Fi from cyberattacks.
Visit guarddog.aiWe analyzed Guarddog.ai page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
guarddog.ai performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value15.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value1,720 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value16.9 s
5/100
10%
244 ms
1145 ms
77 ms
150 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Guarddog.ai, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Guarddog.ai.
Page size can be reduced by 512.3 kB (19%)
2.7 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Guarddog.ai main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 120.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GuardDog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 363.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 363.8 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Guarddog.ai has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (80%)
86
17
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GuardDog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
guarddog.ai
244 ms
guarddog.ai
1145 ms
style.min.css
77 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
150 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
222 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
226 ms
grid-system.css
223 ms
style.css
306 ms
header-layout-menu-left-aligned.css
229 ms
element-cascading-images.css
231 ms
element-toggles.css
291 ms
element-icon-with-text.css
293 ms
element-wpb-column-border.css
296 ms
css
27 ms
responsive.css
296 ms
flickity.css
301 ms
skin-material.css
364 ms
menu-dynamic.css
367 ms
widget-nectar-posts.css
368 ms
js_composer.min.css
369 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
455 ms
style.css
374 ms
css
25 ms
app.css
434 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
433 ms
jquery.min.js
514 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
441 ms
frontEndMailchimpWidget.js
447 ms
animate.min.css
503 ms
dashicons.min.css
577 ms
display-opinions-light.css
513 ms
font-awesome.min.css
522 ms
display-structure.css
523 ms
style-non-critical.css
575 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
585 ms
core.css
586 ms
slide-out-right-material.css
596 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
597 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
647 ms
e-202411.js
14 ms
priority.js
648 ms
transit.min.js
593 ms
waypoints.js
525 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
465 ms
hoverintent.min.js
462 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
507 ms
anime.min.js
508 ms
intersection-observer.min.js
516 ms
flickity.min.js
533 ms
superfish.js
465 ms
init.js
551 ms
touchswipe.min.js
509 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
509 ms
app.js
761 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
466 ms
underscore.min.js
513 ms
backbone.min.js
516 ms
front-end-deps.js
531 ms
front-end.js
534 ms
front-end.js
486 ms
ugw7pin.css
532 ms
front-end.js
514 ms
dwf.js
512 ms
p.css
35 ms
analytics.js
264 ms
gtm.js
263 ms
gtm.js
354 ms
blue.png
260 ms
Untitled-2_1-blue.png
258 ms
Untitled-2_2-blue.png
258 ms
Untitled-2_3-blue.png
257 ms
dark.jpg
350 ms
homepage-mockup-2.png
257 ms
homepage-hero-v2.jpg
522 ms
cloud.jpg
604 ms
slide-1-do-you.jpg
578 ms
slide-2-Why-are-cybersecurity-analytics-so-complex-and-expensive_.jpg
325 ms
slide-3-are-you.jpg
497 ms
slide-4-lets.jpg
578 ms
cta-bkgd.jpg
400 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilXs1Ug.ttf
277 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVilXs1Ug.ttf
278 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GCC5Xs1Ug.ttf
351 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GMS5Xs1Ug.ttf
352 ms
icomoon.woff
227 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
344 ms
collect
105 ms
iframe_api
106 ms
hotjar-2407563.js
164 ms
fbevents.js
110 ms
events.js
106 ms
js
77 ms
www-widgetapi.js
46 ms
guarddog.ai accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
guarddog.ai best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
guarddog.ai SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Guarddog.ai can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Guarddog.ai main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
guarddog.ai
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GuardDog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: