4.3 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.4 sec
600 ms
Visit guarditall.net now to see the best up-to-date Guarditall content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about guarditall.net
-
Visit guarditall.netWe analyzed Guarditall.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
guarditall.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value2,410 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.201
61/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
1264 ms
60 ms
42 ms
180 ms
202 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Guarditall.net, 48% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 28% (7 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Guarditall.net.
Page size can be reduced by 525.0 kB (75%)
701.4 kB
176.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Guarditall.net main page is 701.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 607.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 501.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 501.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Guarditall images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (37%)
19
12
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Guarditall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.guarditall.net
1264 ms
bt
60 ms
minified.js
42 ms
fetch.umd.js
180 ms
bolt-custom-elements.min.js
202 ms
requirejs.min.js
201 ms
bolt-performance
12 ms
dynamicmodel
58 ms
wixcode-worker.js
127 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
105 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
104 ms
crediticon.png
616 ms
deliveryicon.png
711 ms
ukicon.png
587 ms
3dcac5_c4f23237ed2c41958a1cb877d30ff8a9~mv2.jpg
530 ms
3dcac5_ab9ab3025f854ff0bbed89bc8d470372~mv2.jpg
594 ms
3dcac5_b4d105c181474b70bdd7eace71479cfc~mv2_d_2436_2436_s_4_2.jpg
878 ms
3dcac5_8a7e65201b5f4c21952051dba60d561d~mv2_d_1206_1205_s_2.jpg
839 ms
bt
6 ms
a9eddc47-990d-47a3-be4e-c8cdec0090c6.woff
101 ms
0c0f4d28-4c13-4e84-9a36-e63cd529ae86.woff
100 ms
4e5713c6-f9bf-44d7-bc17-775b7c102f1c.woff
141 ms
9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff
140 ms
cacc0862-f146-4746-92b1-60e6114a66c4.woff
139 ms
lodash.min.js
36 ms
guarditall.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
guarditall.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
guarditall.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Guarditall.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Guarditall.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
guarditall.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Guarditall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: