4.4 sec in total
107 ms
3.3 sec
1 sec
Click here to check amazing Guards On Call content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about guardsoncall.us
Guards On Call offers top-rated armed and unarmed 24-hour security guard services serving clients in Texas, USA. Open 24/7! - Free Consultations - Book now! (281) 402-8000.
Visit guardsoncall.usWe analyzed Guardsoncall.us page load time and found that the first response time was 107 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
guardsoncall.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value2.4 s
92/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.074
95/100
15%
Value4.6 s
82/100
10%
107 ms
155 ms
61 ms
79 ms
84 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Guardsoncall.us, 6% (5 requests) were made to Developer.marketingplatform.ca and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Guardsoncall.us.
Page size can be reduced by 694.0 kB (21%)
3.2 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Guardsoncall.us main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 674.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 674.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Guards On Call images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (55%)
73
33
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Guards On Call. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
guardsoncall.us
107 ms
guardsoncall.us
155 ms
public-main.js
61 ms
jquery.min.js
79 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
84 ms
owl.carousel.js
72 ms
custom-carousel.js
76 ms
js
138 ms
frontend.js
82 ms
gtm.js
208 ms
goc_logo.png
69 ms
24_7.png
78 ms
user.png
116 ms
ANXAkqG3Lo60FQIUpY4dYKybU5qilMqDjgZSXD1ILxZyjaDQh-boIpmLAiY3pjnC5W9VJKhrc8-_300S8xMGHQnhLhUXQKlU_z6noKA=s1600-w300-h300
311 ms
frontend.min.js
54 ms
popper.min.js
80 ms
htbbootstrap.js
57 ms
waypoints.js
59 ms
htmega-widgets-active.js
80 ms
googlesitekit-consent-mode-3d6495dceaebc28bcca3.js
80 ms
frontend-script.js
79 ms
widget-scripts.js
87 ms
api.js
80 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
78 ms
index.js
100 ms
ivory-search.min.js
124 ms
wp-consent-api.min.js
97 ms
hooks.min.js
98 ms
i18n.min.js
97 ms
index.js
122 ms
index.js
124 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
123 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
125 ms
core.min.js
124 ms
frontend.min.js
168 ms
animate-circle.min.js
126 ms
elementor.js
125 ms
url.min.js
166 ms
api-fetch.min.js
169 ms
widgets.js
167 ms
h_banner2.jpg
168 ms
service_1.jpg
170 ms
gemail.png
94 ms
gphone.png
90 ms
gfax.png
90 ms
gdescribe.png
89 ms
arrow.png
152 ms
service_2.jpg
244 ms
service_3.jpg-1.jpg
141 ms
service_4.jpg
134 ms
h_about2.jpg
136 ms
serve1.png
133 ms
serve3.png
128 ms
serve8.png
131 ms
serve9.png
128 ms
serve5.png
212 ms
serve6.png
209 ms
serve2.png
206 ms
serve4.png
184 ms
serve7.png
187 ms
location-bg.jpg
186 ms
location-1.jpg
188 ms
recaptcha__en.js
43 ms
city-image.png
188 ms
location-3.jpg
181 ms
location-4.jpg
168 ms
location-5.jpg
169 ms
location-6.jpg
171 ms
powered_by_google_on_white.png
168 ms
ChIJwfLyqVshTIYRhsAA4vA4xew_6b71d0635a23858b90321b872125ab66.jpg
1702 ms
ChIJwfLyqVshTIYRhsAA4vA4xew_1bd4627817e6b799ae9d13a18cfc968b.jpg
1968 ms
ChIJwfLyqVshTIYRhsAA4vA4xew_ee0d1ef13df0abc211b59d2f0bf2611e.jpg
1409 ms
ChIJwfLyqVshTIYRhsAA4vA4xew_1c7439db66df0ea94098c7be64784257.jpg
2187 ms
ChIJwfLyqVshTIYRhsAA4vA4xew_74da2651b0c3a3411cd35e32e9c169b3.jpg
2290 ms
ChIJwfLyqVshTIYRhsAA4vA4xew_85899fef8115596a08f9b8c95327629c.jpg
2478 ms
ChIJwfLyqVshTIYRhsAA4vA4xew_5d1ac0f70edbd9869f73595b96207035.jpg
2895 ms
f3cc4ad81be42d25e1d3389acb1ebe6fd65c2d6f.png
1670 ms
434d3669bc2eca1ce33cc7db24350ba8bee91c21.png
1745 ms
fd9144d350530c50f0e94e2c631e5d987a7caab1.png
1762 ms
home_ready2.jpg
1776 ms
elementskit.woff
1737 ms
js
58 ms
44814261.js
152 ms
fb.js
65 ms
44814261.js
191 ms
collectedforms.js
67 ms
banner.js
80 ms
guest.png
558 ms
guardsoncall.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
guardsoncall.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
guardsoncall.us SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Guardsoncall.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Guardsoncall.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
guardsoncall.us
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Guards On Call. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: