6.4 sec in total
1.2 sec
4.5 sec
708 ms
Click here to check amazing Guusje Dekker content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about guusjedekker.com
Visit guusjedekker.comWe analyzed Guusjedekker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
guusjedekker.com performance score
1230 ms
258 ms
46 ms
275 ms
426 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Guusjedekker.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Guusjedekker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (41%)
4.8 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Guusjedekker.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Guusje Dekker needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 350.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 350.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 398.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Guusjedekker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 398.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (71%)
73
21
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Guusje Dekker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
guusjedekker.com
1230 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
258 ms
font-awesome.min.css
46 ms
frontend.css
275 ms
animate.css
426 ms
frontend.css
217 ms
font-awesome.min.css
33 ms
css
48 ms
frontend.css
266 ms
slider-pro.min.css
390 ms
jquery.selectbox.css
324 ms
frontend.css
429 ms
css
61 ms
font-awesome.min.css
450 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
369 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
416 ms
animate.css
615 ms
style.css
557 ms
responsive.css
516 ms
lsow-frontend.css
534 ms
icomoon.css
541 ms
jquery.js
735 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
608 ms
frontend.js
635 ms
jquery.sliderPro.js
912 ms
jquery.selectbox-0.2.min.js
656 ms
frontend.js
696 ms
front.css
664 ms
service-box-service-box-style-4f0b22d6fac3.css
681 ms
style.css
704 ms
sow-button-wire-7d6df2e2509b.css
731 ms
style.css
780 ms
sow-image-sow-image-4333b04dd157.css
782 ms
sow-image-sow-image-1c389ca87c1a.css
781 ms
sow-image-sow-image-b5a0057b6480.css
780 ms
sow-contact-form-default-5fb5374a3f13.css
815 ms
owl.carousel.css
893 ms
widgets.css
893 ms
frontend.js
891 ms
SmoothScroll.js
906 ms
parallax.js
948 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
797 ms
jquery.localScroll.min.js
791 ms
jquery.nav.js
764 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
774 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
730 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
684 ms
jquery.actual.min.js
692 ms
nivo-lightbox.min.js
690 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
697 ms
custom.js
695 ms
lsow-frontend.min.js
697 ms
wp-embed.min.js
632 ms
contact.min.js
652 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
655 ms
bg.png
426 ms
Portfolio_ChildrensBook3_1920x800.jpg
589 ms
Comic.jpg
507 ms
Portfolio_ChildrensBook1-560x450.jpg
515 ms
Lolypop2-1-560x450.jpg
427 ms
BarendPDDNOS-1-560x450.jpg
521 ms
Showreal_image2-560x450.jpg
427 ms
Portfolio_YouHaveABaby-560x450.jpg
466 ms
Photo_travel3-560x450.jpg
574 ms
Profile_Pic_2-e1455366789916.png
2383 ms
Logo_Tafel15.png
647 ms
Logo_Submarine.png
644 ms
Logo_WhiplashStichtingNL.png
654 ms
overlay4.png
644 ms
down-arrow.png
657 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
14 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
16 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
14 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
15 ms
yVHpdQrmTj9Kax1tmFSx2j8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
15 ms
RzoNiRR1p2Mqyyz2RwqSMw.woff
15 ms
AwBqWF2kjhlybWamaKMPcT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
14 ms
guusjedekker.com
1357 ms
portfolio-text-bg.png
715 ms
typicons.woff
658 ms
bx_loader.gif
343 ms
controls.png
341 ms
guusjedekker.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Guusjedekker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Guusjedekker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
guusjedekker.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Guusje Dekker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: