3.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.5 sec
140 ms
Welcome to gympf.dk homepage info - get ready to check Gympf best content right away, or after learning these important things about gympf.dk
Gymnasieskolernes Pædagogikumforening
Visit gympf.dkWe analyzed Gympf.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
gympf.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value17.8 s
0/100
10%
Value18.0 s
0/100
25%
Value17.8 s
0/100
10%
Value420 ms
66/100
30%
Value0.04
100/100
15%
Value21.1 s
2/100
10%
1083 ms
349 ms
304 ms
22 ms
450 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Gympf.dk, 11% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Gympfny.ndd.dk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Gympf.dk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (76%)
2.0 MB
484.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Gympf.dk main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 136.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gympf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 784.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 784.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 573.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gympf.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 573.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (89%)
36
4
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gympf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gympf.dk
1083 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
349 ms
layerslider.css
304 ms
css
22 ms
bbpress.css
450 ms
styles.css
242 ms
settings.css
419 ms
style.css
959 ms
font-awesome.css
344 ms
animations.css
381 ms
media.css
304 ms
ipad.css
352 ms
style_login_widget.css
393 ms
greensock.js
410 ms
jquery.js
639 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
455 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
571 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
494 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
606 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
767 ms
css
14 ms
css
21 ms
css
22 ms
editor.js
414 ms
jquery.form.min.js
505 ms
scripts.js
537 ms
comment-reply.min.js
639 ms
modernizr-min.js
560 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
691 ms
jquery.cycle.js
737 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
669 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
680 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
731 ms
main.js
1241 ms
wp-embed.min.js
962 ms
gympf_logo.jpg
326 ms
forside.jpg
519 ms
icomoon.woff
106 ms
gympf.dk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
gympf.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gympf.dk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DA
DA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gympf.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gympf.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gympf.dk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gympf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: