2 sec in total
45 ms
1.6 sec
334 ms
Visit maps.google.com now to see the best up-to-date Maps Google content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about maps.google.com
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Visit maps.google.comWe analyzed Maps.google.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
maps.google.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value9,530 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.2 s
6/100
10%
45 ms
34 ms
56 ms
321 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Maps.google.com, 77% (67 requests) were made to Google.com and 11% (10 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (663 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (58%)
2.7 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Maps.google.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 546.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 546.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Maps Google images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 989.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 989.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (28%)
79
57
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maps Google. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
maps.google.com
45 ms
maps
34 ms
@
56 ms
@
321 ms
common.js
124 ms
logging_serialization.js
124 ms
util.js
115 ms
onion.js
144 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
550 ms
marker.js
130 ms
layers.js
127 ms
poly.js
135 ms
desktop_ui.js
133 ms
printing.js
138 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
581 ms
stats.js
130 ms
controls.js
131 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
498 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
559 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
597 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
663 ms
controls_common.js
130 ms
desktop_controls.js
129 ms
closure_ui.js
126 ms
searchbox_library.js
127 ms
searchbox.js
128 ms
desktop_searchbox_ui.js
343 ms
cards.js
341 ms
desktop_cards_ui.js
343 ms
googlelogo_color_74x24dp.png
238 ms
googlelogo_62x24_with_2_stroke_color_66x26dp.png
237 ms
transparent.png
298 ms
desktop_spritesheet.png
403 ms
mapcnt6.png
249 ms
sv5.png
240 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
282 ms
kh
322 ms
tmapctrl.png
101 ms
cb_scout5.png
170 ms
tmapctrl4.png
166 ms
@
553 ms
ic_directions_quantum.png
122 ms
spinner_color.gif
145 ms
suggest
145 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
37 ms
vt
38 ms
vt
43 ms
vt
42 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
46 ms
vt
49 ms
vt
54 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
55 ms
vt
56 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
56 ms
vt
61 ms
vt
57 ms
vt
57 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
63 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
59 ms
vt
62 ms
vt
59 ms
vt
63 ms
vt
63 ms
vt
62 ms
vt
66 ms
vt
65 ms
vt
73 ms
vt
68 ms
vt
65 ms
vt
63 ms
vt
39 ms
vt
39 ms
vt
38 ms
vt
37 ms
vt
35 ms
vt
32 ms
vt
34 ms
vt
29 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
13 ms
maps.google.com accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
maps.google.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
maps.google.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maps.google.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Maps.google.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
maps.google.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Maps Google. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: